Abstract 399P
Background
Due to the lack of studies on unfit patients with gastric cancer (GC) who did not receive any aggressive cancer treatment—best supportive care (BSC) cases—their long-term prognosis remains unclear, especially for those harboring potentially curable disease (clinical stage [cStage] I–III). Therefore, clinicians sometimes have trouble answering unfit patients or their caregivers when asked questions such as “How long will I live without any anticancer treatment?”. Hence, we conducted this observational study to capture the real-world data of baseline characteristics, provided supportive care, and long-term outcomes for BSC cases.
Methods
Consecutive clinical records of patients with GC diagnosed at Steel Memorial Muroran Hospital (SMMH) from January 2017 to December 2021 were collected and analyzed. We conducted this study with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of SMMH (#J230103). The primary outcome of this study is overall survival (OS).
Results
Of 481 patients diagnosed with GC, 91 (18.9%) were BSC cases; their median age was 85 (range: 46–96) years, and 75.8% were male. BSC cases showed a very high risk of receiving aggressive cancer treatment with a median Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 7 and a G-8 score of 7. The median OS for all patients was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0–5.4). The median OS was 12.4, 8.3, and 2.5 months for cStage I, II–III, and IV, respectively. Patients with potentially curable GC (cStage I–III) had significantly longer OS than those with incurable disease (cStage IV), with a hazard ratio for death of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.18–0.47, p<0.0001). The percentage of death by GC in a total number of deaths also increased with increasing stage. Pneumonia and heart failure were the most common cause of death among cases who died other than GC. After diagnosis, cStage I patients were more likely to prefer to stay where they had lived (nursing homes or their own house), while more advanced stage patients chose hospice.
Conclusions
The median OS of BSC cases in poor general condition was ∼1 year for cStage I, 8 months for cStage II–III, and < 3 months for cStage IV.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
K. Takada: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eisai, Janssen, Chugai, Ono, Otsuka, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract