Abstract 152P
Background
Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (Nal-IRI/FU/LV; NFF) is a standard treatment after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer (uPC) patients (pts). However, there has been no data comparing safety between prior biliary drainage (BD) and non-BD (NBD). Therefore, we conducted such a study and report the results of the interim sub-analysis.
Methods
As part of a pre-planned interim analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study from June 2021, we analyzed the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of uPC pts associated with safety; adverse events (AEs), dose modification, and relative dose intensity between patients in the BD and NBD groups. This analysis was conducted on attaining 50% of the target cases.
Results
The median follow-up period was 5.3 months. Of the 75 pts, NFF was administered to the 19 pts in the BD group and the 56 pts in the NBD group. The BD group was significantly younger (p=0.049), included more locally advanced disease (p=0.04) and pancreatic head cases (p<0.01), and the duration of their previous treatment was shorter (p=0.02) compared with the NBD group. The median relative dose intensities in the BD and NBD groups of Nal-IRI were 78.1% and 69.8% (p=0.21) and of FU 89.9% and 80.4% (p=0.23), respectively. For the initial dose, 42% and 59% of pts in the BD and NBD groups needed Nal-IRI dose reduction, respectively (p=0.53). The rates of dose reduction during NFF did not differ in Nal-IRI or in FU, and those of discontinuation of NFF due to AEs were similar in the two groups (7% vs 8%). The rate of grade 3/4 non-hematological AEs was higher in the BD group (63% vs 30%; p=0.01), whereas that of hematological AEs was equivalent (32% vs 32%; p=0.96). Frequent grade 3/4 AEs in the BD group were neutropenia (26%), anemia (16%), and fatigue (15%). Additionally, biliary tract infections were observed only in the BD group (16%, p<0.01).
Conclusions
NFF more frequently caused severe non-hematological AEs and biliary tract infections in the BD group. Therefore, more attention should be paid to pts with prior BD for safety.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
We thank Robert Blakytny, DPhil, from Edanz for editing a draft of this abstract.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract