Abstract 250P
Background
Seminoma is the most common type of germ cell tumors representing 95% of all testicular neoplasm with mean age at diagnosis of 39 years. The standard treatment modality for stage I/II is orchidectomy with high cure rate.There is an active debate regarding the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I/II due to the high relapse rate and potential for overtreatment with serious systemic side effects. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of adjuvant treatment in stage I and stage II seminoma comparing the young and adolescents to older age groups.
Methods
Data of 11718 patients diagnosed with seminoma stage I/II were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2000 to 2020. They were grouped by age at diagnosis into younger than 25 years (young age group), 25 to 49 years ( middle age group) and older than 50 years (old age group). SPSS 23 was used for data analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test for survival analysis.
Results
Patients treated surgically with no systemic therapy had 5-year relative survival of 99,4% compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (98.3%) and adjuvant radiotherapy(100%), P<0.0001. The middle age group had quite similar 5-year relative survival compared to the young age group and the elderly (99.5%, 99.3% and 99%; P<0.0001). In the young age group the 5-year relative survival was 99.9% with orchidectomy, 97.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 100% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001). In the middle age group, the 5-year relative survival was 99.2% with surgery with no systemic therapy, 98.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99,9% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001) while the old age group had 5-year relative survival of 98.9% for orchidectomy, 97.5% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99.6% with adjuvant radiotherapy(p <0.0001).
Conclusions
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for clinical stage I and stage II testicular seminoma came statistically significant. However, adjuvant systemic therapy has very limited survival benefit compared to surgical management with no systemic therapy which discourage the use of adjuvant therapy for less systemic side effects with similar overall survival across different age groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract