Abstract 250P
Background
Seminoma is the most common type of germ cell tumors representing 95% of all testicular neoplasm with mean age at diagnosis of 39 years. The standard treatment modality for stage I/II is orchidectomy with high cure rate.There is an active debate regarding the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I/II due to the high relapse rate and potential for overtreatment with serious systemic side effects. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of adjuvant treatment in stage I and stage II seminoma comparing the young and adolescents to older age groups.
Methods
Data of 11718 patients diagnosed with seminoma stage I/II were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2000 to 2020. They were grouped by age at diagnosis into younger than 25 years (young age group), 25 to 49 years ( middle age group) and older than 50 years (old age group). SPSS 23 was used for data analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test for survival analysis.
Results
Patients treated surgically with no systemic therapy had 5-year relative survival of 99,4% compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (98.3%) and adjuvant radiotherapy(100%), P<0.0001. The middle age group had quite similar 5-year relative survival compared to the young age group and the elderly (99.5%, 99.3% and 99%; P<0.0001). In the young age group the 5-year relative survival was 99.9% with orchidectomy, 97.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 100% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001). In the middle age group, the 5-year relative survival was 99.2% with surgery with no systemic therapy, 98.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99,9% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001) while the old age group had 5-year relative survival of 98.9% for orchidectomy, 97.5% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99.6% with adjuvant radiotherapy(p <0.0001).
Conclusions
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for clinical stage I and stage II testicular seminoma came statistically significant. However, adjuvant systemic therapy has very limited survival benefit compared to surgical management with no systemic therapy which discourage the use of adjuvant therapy for less systemic side effects with similar overall survival across different age groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
251P - LDH isozyme as a prognostic factor for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mCRCC)
Presenter: Hayato Takeda
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
252P - Risk factors for recurrence after curative nephrectomy in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Kristine Tejada
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
253TiP - WUTSUP-02-II-Neo-Dis-Tis: Investigating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus disitamab vedotin with adjuvant tislelizumab in upper urinary tract carcinoma: A phase II multi-center study
Presenter: Yige Bao
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
254TiP - Prospective observational trial of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in Japanese patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: JACUMET trial
Presenter: Yuji Miura
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
264P - Interim results from a phase I study of AMG 509 (xaluritamig), a STEAP1 x CD3 XmAb 2+1 immune therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Chia-Chi Lin
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
266P - Clinical application and potential impact of liquid biopsy on the management of Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A territory-wide prospective analysis
Presenter: Wai Kay Philip Kwong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
267P - Exploring homologous recombination deficiency threshold for predicting response to PARP inhibitor in prostate cancer
Presenter: Diwei Zhao
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
268P - Comparisons of on new-onset prostate cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus exposed to the SGLT2I and DPP4I: A population-based cohort study
Presenter: Hou In Chou
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
269P - Prostate cancer harboring low COMT expression correlates with a poor prognosis and response to enzalutamide
Presenter: Shigekatsu Maekawa
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
270P - Germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in Japanese patients with prostate cancer are predictive factors for androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy or chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer
Presenter: Shigekatsu Maekawa
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract