Abstract 250P
Background
Seminoma is the most common type of germ cell tumors representing 95% of all testicular neoplasm with mean age at diagnosis of 39 years. The standard treatment modality for stage I/II is orchidectomy with high cure rate.There is an active debate regarding the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I/II due to the high relapse rate and potential for overtreatment with serious systemic side effects. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of adjuvant treatment in stage I and stage II seminoma comparing the young and adolescents to older age groups.
Methods
Data of 11718 patients diagnosed with seminoma stage I/II were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2000 to 2020. They were grouped by age at diagnosis into younger than 25 years (young age group), 25 to 49 years ( middle age group) and older than 50 years (old age group). SPSS 23 was used for data analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test for survival analysis.
Results
Patients treated surgically with no systemic therapy had 5-year relative survival of 99,4% compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (98.3%) and adjuvant radiotherapy(100%), P<0.0001. The middle age group had quite similar 5-year relative survival compared to the young age group and the elderly (99.5%, 99.3% and 99%; P<0.0001). In the young age group the 5-year relative survival was 99.9% with orchidectomy, 97.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 100% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001). In the middle age group, the 5-year relative survival was 99.2% with surgery with no systemic therapy, 98.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99,9% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001) while the old age group had 5-year relative survival of 98.9% for orchidectomy, 97.5% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99.6% with adjuvant radiotherapy(p <0.0001).
Conclusions
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for clinical stage I and stage II testicular seminoma came statistically significant. However, adjuvant systemic therapy has very limited survival benefit compared to surgical management with no systemic therapy which discourage the use of adjuvant therapy for less systemic side effects with similar overall survival across different age groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
217P - Conditional reprogramming of urine-derived bladder cancer cells: A model for precision medicine
Presenter: Yu Dong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
218P - Clinical effectiveness of tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) versus GC as adjuvant therapy in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC): A real-world study
Presenter: xingliang Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
219P - Clinical effectiveness of tislelizumab plus TKI as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A real-world study
Presenter: Pei Dong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
220P - Heterogeneity in tertiary lymphoid structures predicts distinct prognosis and immune microenvironment characterizations of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Wenhao Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
221P - Genetic polymorphism of genes encoding cytokines interleukin1 1-alpha and TNF-alpha in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Anil Kumar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
222P - The association between response to enfortumab vedotin and peripheral neuropathy: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan
Presenter: Nozomi Hayakawa
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
223P - Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences for treatments in advanced renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Niara Oliveira
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
224P - WUTSUP-01: Phase II trial of neoadjuvant toripalimab and chemotherapy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Yige Bao
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
225P - A novel multianalyte signature for stratifying Indian non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A single center observational study
Presenter: Hari P S
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
226P - Prognosis stratification of immunotherapy by a mutational signature in urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Xuebing Han
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract