Abstract 24P
Background
Genetic testing for hereditary cancer is important for clinical treatment and risk management for patients and high-risk individuals. The landscape of genetic testing for germline cancer predisposition has shifted from single gene testing to the more cost-effective multi-gene panels. However, multi-gene panel testing results in greater variant of uncertain significance (VUS) rates and secondary findings, which is challenging for clinical management. In this study, we aim to describe the genetic testing uptake and variant distribution in a single genetic counselling and testing centre in Malaysia.
Methods
A descriptive retrospective analysis of patients seen at a single genetic counselling and testing centre was conducted. Patients were referred from clinicians or self-referred from January 2019 until December 2022. Researchers conducted intake calls, collected pedigrees and written informed consent from all patients prior to genetic testing. Pre and post-test genetic counseling was provided by the certified genetic counselor. Patients were offered either physical consultation or telegenetic counselling. Multi-gene panels were used to analyze between 19 to 47 genes which are associated with an increased risk of hereditary cancer.
Results
Among the 489 who were referred, 430 (88%) came forward for genetic counseling, the majority of them were referred from private hospitals within the Klang Valley. Among the 381 (89%) who proceeded with genetic testing, 13.9% had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, 24.4%, variant of uncertain significance and 61.7% had no variants detected. Majority of the patients had breast cancer (77%) and 84% met current genetic testing guidelines criteria.
Conclusions
The uptake rate of genetic testing is high after pre-test genetic counselling. However, there is a high rate of VUS which causes uncertainties for the patients and their clinicians in making clinical management decisions. Adequate pre and post-test genetic counseling can ensure a better understanding of these variants’ implication and provide support of potential psychosocial impact to the patient.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Cancer Research Malaysia.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract