Abstract 565P
Background
Acquired genomic alternations are known mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Addition of genome-guided targeted therapy (GGTT) to osimertinib may improve treatment outcomes.
Methods
This retrospective study reviewed 226 metastatic EGFR mutation positive NSCLC patients who received systemic therapy after failing osimertinib. Primary endpoints include time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) from post-osimertinib failure.
Results
Total of 68 patients had genomic analysis for osimertinib resistance and 21 (30%) had targetable genomic alternations. Out of which, 17 received osimertinib plus GGTT (13 MET amplification, 2 ALK rearrangement, 1 RET rearrangement and 1 BRAF V600E mutation) and 209 patients received chemotherapy. Median follow-up were 10.0 and 30.1 months for GGTT and chemotherapy group respectively. The GGTT group achieved significantly longer TTF (not reached [NR] vs 5.1 months, HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.48, p<0.001) and OS (NR versus 10.5 months, HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.86, p=0.026) compared to those receiving chemotherapy. These results remained significant after multivariate analysis (Table). In subgroup analysis, TTF of GGTT group was superior to chemotherapy alone (n=148) (NR versus 4.5 months, HR 0.18, p<0.001), chemotherapy plus osimertinib (n=41) (NR versus 6.2 months, HR 0.23, p=0.003) and chemotherapy plus anti-PD(L)1 plus anti-VEGF (n=20) (NR versus 6.3 months, HR 0.25, p=0.009), respectively. Table: 565P
Time to treatment failure | Overall survival | |||||||
Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
HR | P-value | HR | P-value | HR | P-value | HR | P-value | |
Age (>65) | 0.95 | 0.74 | 1.16 | 0.35 | ||||
Gender (Female) | 0.94 | 0.43 | 0.85 | 0.046 | ||||
PS (>1) | 1.67 | 0.014 | 1.75 | 0.009 | 2.54 | <0.001 | 2.73 | <0.001 |
EGFR (ex19 del vs L858R)* | 1.03 | 0.83 | 0.98 | 0.91 | ||||
Line of Osimertinib (>1) | 1.51 | 0.037 | 1.40 | 0.10 | ||||
CNS metastases | 1.09 | 0.55 | 1.28 | 0.12 | ||||
Liver metastases | 1.30 | 0.05 | 1.36 | 0.05 | 1.42 | 0.037 | 1.50 | 0.016 |
Bone metastases | 1.92 | 0.001 | 1.71 | 0.011 | ||||
Therapy (GGTT) | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.22 | 0.001 | 0.27 | 0.026 | 0.24 | 0.015 |
∗2 patients with EGFR mutations other than exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R mutation excluded from analysisCNS, central nervous system; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PS, performance status
Conclusions
The combination of GGTT and osimertinib improves TTF and OS in EGFR mutation positive NSCLC patients failing osimertinib. Future prospective comparative study is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M.S.C. Li: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Takeda, Pfizer, Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Gilead, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Amgen, ACE Oncology, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Takeda. K.W.C. Lee: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: ACT Genomics; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda, Janssen, C-stone; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, Janssen, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: ACT Genomics, Prenetics. H.H.F. Loong: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly, Illumina, Bayer, Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, Takeda. T.S.K. Mok: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, Amgen, Berry Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, C4 Therapeutics, D3 Bio, Eisai, G1 Therapeutics, Gritstone Oncology, GeneDecode, Hutchmed, Incyte Corporation, IQVIA, Lilly, Lunit, MSD, Novartis, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Yuhan Corporation, ACEA Pharma, AstraZeneca, Blueprint, BMS, Covidien LP, Curio Science, Daiichi Sankyo, Fishawack Facilitate, Gilead Sciences, Guardant Health, Hengrui, Ignyta, Inivata, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Merck Serono, Mirati, Origimed, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, Takeda, Virtus; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, MSD, G1 Therapeutics, Takeda, XCovery, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: ACEA Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Fishawack Facilitate, Janssen, Lucence Health, Medscape LLC, MSD, OrigiMed, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Research to Practice, Sanofi-Aventis, Liangyihui Network Technology, Takeda, Alpha Biopharma, Amoy Diagnostics, BeiGene, BMS, Daz Group, InMed Medical Communication, Lilly, MD Health Brazil, Merck, Novartis, P. Permanyer, Physicians' Education Resource, PrIME Oncology, Roche, Shanghai BeBirds, Taiho, Touch Independent Medical Education; Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: AstraZeneca, Lunit, ATORG, CSCO, HKCTS, HutchMed, ASCO, CLCRF, HKCF; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Aurora Tele-Oncology, Hutchmed, ACT Genomic. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract