Abstract 496P
Background
Fruquintinib (F, a highly selective VEGFR inhibitor) plus sintilimab (S, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) showed promising antitumor activity in both pre-clinical and clinical studies. Here, we reported the results of advanced NSCLC cohort with PD-L1-positive expression in an open-label, multi-cohort, single-arm phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of F+S.
Methods
Eligible advanced NSCLC pts were those who failed, could not tolerate, were not suitable or unwilling to receive standard treatment; were PD-L1 positive (defined as PD-L1 TPS expression ≥1%); and were without EGFR, ALK or ROS1 genetic alteration if non-sq-NSCLC. Enrolled pts received 21-day cycles of F (5 mg, orally QD, 2 weeks on/1 week off) plus S (200 mg IV, Q3W) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity or the maximum duration of treatment with S (24 mo). The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST 1.1.
Results
As of May 31, 2023, 13 treatment-naïve pts were enrolled and received treatment of F+S. Median age, 69 yrs (range: 36-75); male, 12 (92.3%) pts; sq-NSCLC, 7 (53.8%) pts; adenocarcinoma, 6 (46.2%) pts. Pts with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and <50% were 6 (46.2%) and 7 (53.8%), respectively. The median follow-up duration was 17.7 (95%CI: 10.4, 18.4) mo. Among 12 pts with at least one post-baseline tumor assessment, the confirmed ORR was 50.0% (95%CI: 21.1%, 78.9%); DCR was 100% (95%CI: 73.5%, 100%); the median DoR, PFS, and OS were all not reached. 15mo-PFS rate was 55.9% (95%CI: 24.0%, 79.0%), and 18mo-OS rate was 60.6% (95%CI: 29.4%, 81.4%). When stratified by PD-L1 level (TPS ≥50% vs <50%), 15mo-PFS rate were 66.7% (95%CI: 19.5%, 90.4%) vs 42.9% (95%CI: 5.8%, 77.7%), 18mo-OS rate were 66.7% (95%CI: 19.5%, 90.4%) vs 53.6% (95%CI: 13.2%, 82.5%). The median treatment duration of F and S were both 8.3 mo (range 0.7-18.6). All pts experienced TEAEs, and the most common (≥10%) ≥G3 treatment related TEAE was only blood pressure increased (15.4%).
Conclusions
F plus S showed a promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicity for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1-positive status. This study might represent a potential treatment option for these pts, especially for pts who can not tolerate chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03903705.
Editorial acknowledgement
Editorial support is provided by Ye Liu from HUTCHMED Limited.
Legal entity responsible for the study
HUTCHMED Limited.
Funding
HUTCHMED Limited.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract