Abstract 126P
Background
Treatment of LARC has the main goal to achieve a tumor pathological complete response (pCR) that is strongly related to better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). However, it occurs only in 10-30% of LARC patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with a high rate of distant metastasis (DM). TNT can improve patient’s outcomes by delivering systemic chemotherapy and nCRT prior to surgery. Multiple randomized trials (RAPIDO, PRODIGE 23, OPRA, CAO/ARO/AIO-12) evaluated different TNT strategies in terms of CRT sequencing, chemotherapy intensity, and radiotherapy. Overall, as a result from those trials, emerges that TNT increased pCR rate compared with standard nCRT (28,4% vs 14,3% RAPIDO and 27,5% vs 11,7% PRODIGE 23 and 28% vs 14% OPRA). However, there is lack of data about any difference in pathological response according to primary TH from anal verge and TNT.
Methods
This is a retrospective, multicentric, observational study whose aim is to evaluate the impact of TH from anal verge on pathological response (pR) to TNT in LARC through Ryan modified TRG score. Data were collected from 48 LARC patients (cT4N+), treated with induction mFOLFOX followed by long course nCRT and total mesorectal excision (TME). The secondary endpoint was ORR.
Results
The median age was 65 (± 8), 75% were male. All patients had clinical stage III. TH from anal verge were as follows 21% proximal (>10 cm), 46% middle (5-10 cm), and 33% (<5 cm) distal side. After TNT proximal cancers (PC) showed worst TRGs: TRG-4 (3 patients), TRG-3 (5 patients), and TRG-2 (2 patients). Middle cancers (MC) cancer showed: TRG-3 (1 patient), TRG-2 (11 patients), TRG1-0 (10 patients). Distal cancers (DC) showed: TRG2 (2 patients), TRG1-0 (13 patients). ORR was also different according to the TH: 30% PC, 77% for MC, and 80% for DC.
Conclusions
The results of our study show a correlation between rectal TH and responses to TNT. DCs seem to have a poorer pR to TNT. This data is consistent with recent literature about the actual usefulness of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with DCs and could help to a better selection of patients more suitable for TNT with or without RT.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Pretta: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract