Abstract 486P
Background
Our research group has previously established the cost-effectiveness (CE) of lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for both high-risk smokers and non-smokers in Hong Kong (HK). Integrating LCS into the existing infrastructure in HK however requires systematic and rigorous design and execution. Thus, we undertook sensitivity and scenario analyses for LCS beyond fundamental base-case examination. The aim was to explore balance between clinical efficacy and resource optimization for LCS implementation in HK.
Methods
A CE analysis was conducted using decision tree and state-transition Markov model to simulate identification, diagnosis, and treatments for a high-risk population defined by the NELSON study and the TALENT study. One-way sensitivity analysis (OSA) was conducted with ±20% variation of the base-case parameter values. Scenario analyses were undertaken to explore the CE of LCS with varying costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) was estimated as costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
Results
OSA showed that LDCT costs were the main driver for the ICER of LCS targeting heavy smokers, 20% increase in LDCT costs led to an ICER of USD 18,002 (22% higher than base-case ICER). Meanwhile, 20% increase in the treatments costs for stage I LC led to an ICER of 10,844 (7% higher than base-case ICER) for the LCS targeting high-risk non-smokers. Scenario analyses additionally indicated that restraining costs for CT scan, diagnosis, and early-stage LC treatments would yield a reduction in ICER (Table). Table: 486P
Scenario analysis | Smoker | Non smokers | ||
ICER (USD) ∗ | Reduction in ICER ∗ | ICER (USD) | Reduction in ICER | |
Base-case analysis | $14,723 | NA. | $10,096 | NA. |
Cut down unit costs for low-dose CT scans (LDCT) - USD $ 191 | $12,070 | 18% | $9,520 | 6% |
Cut down unit costs for LDCT - USD $ 127 | $9,377 | 36% | $8,934 | 12% |
Cut down unit costs for LDCT - USD $ 64 | $6,684 | 55% | $8,349 | 17% |
Half diagnostic costs for stage I - USD $ 836 (per person) | $14,472 | 2% | $9,635 | 5% |
Half diagnostic costs for stage IV - USD $ 3,922 (per person) | $14,969 | -2% | $8,872 | 12% |
Half treatment costs for the ongoing phase for stage I patients (per 3 months) - USD $ 247 | $13,296 | 10% | $8,777 | 13% |
Half treatment costs for the ongoing phase for stage IV patients (per 3 months) - USD $ 417 | $14,974 | -2% | $10,145 | 0% |
Conclusions
Fiscal restraint on CT scanning and early-stage LC treatments expenditures are necessary to ensure feasible and sustainable LCS implementation in HK. Our findings provide important benchmarks for the HK Government’s consideration.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AstraZeneca Hong Kong.
Disclosure
H.H.F. Loong: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly, Illumina, Bayer, Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, Takeda. X. Pan: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: i-DNA. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract