Abstract 486P
Background
Our research group has previously established the cost-effectiveness (CE) of lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for both high-risk smokers and non-smokers in Hong Kong (HK). Integrating LCS into the existing infrastructure in HK however requires systematic and rigorous design and execution. Thus, we undertook sensitivity and scenario analyses for LCS beyond fundamental base-case examination. The aim was to explore balance between clinical efficacy and resource optimization for LCS implementation in HK.
Methods
A CE analysis was conducted using decision tree and state-transition Markov model to simulate identification, diagnosis, and treatments for a high-risk population defined by the NELSON study and the TALENT study. One-way sensitivity analysis (OSA) was conducted with ±20% variation of the base-case parameter values. Scenario analyses were undertaken to explore the CE of LCS with varying costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) was estimated as costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
Results
OSA showed that LDCT costs were the main driver for the ICER of LCS targeting heavy smokers, 20% increase in LDCT costs led to an ICER of USD 18,002 (22% higher than base-case ICER). Meanwhile, 20% increase in the treatments costs for stage I LC led to an ICER of 10,844 (7% higher than base-case ICER) for the LCS targeting high-risk non-smokers. Scenario analyses additionally indicated that restraining costs for CT scan, diagnosis, and early-stage LC treatments would yield a reduction in ICER (Table). Table: 486P
Scenario analysis | Smoker | Non smokers | ||
ICER (USD) ∗ | Reduction in ICER ∗ | ICER (USD) | Reduction in ICER | |
Base-case analysis | $14,723 | NA. | $10,096 | NA. |
Cut down unit costs for low-dose CT scans (LDCT) - USD $ 191 | $12,070 | 18% | $9,520 | 6% |
Cut down unit costs for LDCT - USD $ 127 | $9,377 | 36% | $8,934 | 12% |
Cut down unit costs for LDCT - USD $ 64 | $6,684 | 55% | $8,349 | 17% |
Half diagnostic costs for stage I - USD $ 836 (per person) | $14,472 | 2% | $9,635 | 5% |
Half diagnostic costs for stage IV - USD $ 3,922 (per person) | $14,969 | -2% | $8,872 | 12% |
Half treatment costs for the ongoing phase for stage I patients (per 3 months) - USD $ 247 | $13,296 | 10% | $8,777 | 13% |
Half treatment costs for the ongoing phase for stage IV patients (per 3 months) - USD $ 417 | $14,974 | -2% | $10,145 | 0% |
Conclusions
Fiscal restraint on CT scanning and early-stage LC treatments expenditures are necessary to ensure feasible and sustainable LCS implementation in HK. Our findings provide important benchmarks for the HK Government’s consideration.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AstraZeneca Hong Kong.
Disclosure
H.H.F. Loong: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly, Illumina, Bayer, Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, Takeda. X. Pan: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: i-DNA. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
238P - Enfortumab-vedotin for metastatic urothelial carcinoma refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors: A single institution experience
Presenter: Yuki Endo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
239P - Elevated baseline C-reactive protein is a prognostic indicator for OS in patients with metastatic non clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with systemic therapy
Presenter: Ryuichi Mizuno
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
240P - Efficacy and safety of first-line combination therapy with ipilimumab + nivolumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a single institution in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Nagaya
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
241P - First-line cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A real-world exploratory study from eastern India
Presenter: Tamojit Chaudhuri
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
244P - Clinicopathologic feature and treatment outcome of metastatic non clear cell kidney cancer: A single centre experience from India
Presenter: Somnath Roy
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
245P - The role of TGF-β in the formation of the protumor phenotype of circulating neutrophils at different stages of renal cancer
Presenter: Ilseya Myagdieva
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
246P - Impact of renal impairment on first-line treatment in metastatic urothelial cancer
Presenter: Stephanie Wakeling
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
247P - Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the management of bladder adenocarcinoma compared to multiple treatment modalities
Presenter: Othman Mohammed
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
248P - Screening zinc homeostasis-related genes identifies metallothionein 1H (MT1H) as a potential prognostic biomarker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
Presenter: Eyad Al Masoud
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
249P - The prognostic utility of Progestogen associated Endometrial protein (PAEP) gene expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
Presenter: Leen Lataifeh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract