Abstract 486P
Background
Our research group has previously established the cost-effectiveness (CE) of lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for both high-risk smokers and non-smokers in Hong Kong (HK). Integrating LCS into the existing infrastructure in HK however requires systematic and rigorous design and execution. Thus, we undertook sensitivity and scenario analyses for LCS beyond fundamental base-case examination. The aim was to explore balance between clinical efficacy and resource optimization for LCS implementation in HK.
Methods
A CE analysis was conducted using decision tree and state-transition Markov model to simulate identification, diagnosis, and treatments for a high-risk population defined by the NELSON study and the TALENT study. One-way sensitivity analysis (OSA) was conducted with ±20% variation of the base-case parameter values. Scenario analyses were undertaken to explore the CE of LCS with varying costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) was estimated as costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
Results
OSA showed that LDCT costs were the main driver for the ICER of LCS targeting heavy smokers, 20% increase in LDCT costs led to an ICER of USD 18,002 (22% higher than base-case ICER). Meanwhile, 20% increase in the treatments costs for stage I LC led to an ICER of 10,844 (7% higher than base-case ICER) for the LCS targeting high-risk non-smokers. Scenario analyses additionally indicated that restraining costs for CT scan, diagnosis, and early-stage LC treatments would yield a reduction in ICER (Table). Table: 486P
Scenario analysis | Smoker | Non smokers | ||
ICER (USD) ∗ | Reduction in ICER ∗ | ICER (USD) | Reduction in ICER | |
Base-case analysis | $14,723 | NA. | $10,096 | NA. |
Cut down unit costs for low-dose CT scans (LDCT) - USD $ 191 | $12,070 | 18% | $9,520 | 6% |
Cut down unit costs for LDCT - USD $ 127 | $9,377 | 36% | $8,934 | 12% |
Cut down unit costs for LDCT - USD $ 64 | $6,684 | 55% | $8,349 | 17% |
Half diagnostic costs for stage I - USD $ 836 (per person) | $14,472 | 2% | $9,635 | 5% |
Half diagnostic costs for stage IV - USD $ 3,922 (per person) | $14,969 | -2% | $8,872 | 12% |
Half treatment costs for the ongoing phase for stage I patients (per 3 months) - USD $ 247 | $13,296 | 10% | $8,777 | 13% |
Half treatment costs for the ongoing phase for stage IV patients (per 3 months) - USD $ 417 | $14,974 | -2% | $10,145 | 0% |
Conclusions
Fiscal restraint on CT scanning and early-stage LC treatments expenditures are necessary to ensure feasible and sustainable LCS implementation in HK. Our findings provide important benchmarks for the HK Government’s consideration.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AstraZeneca Hong Kong.
Disclosure
H.H.F. Loong: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly, Illumina, Bayer, Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, Takeda. X. Pan: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: i-DNA. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
203P - Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Jia He
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
204P - A radiomics strategy based on CT intra-tumoral and peritumoral regions for preoperative prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer
Presenter: zhiyang li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
205TiP - IMPACT: Randomized, multicenter, phase III study evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy (atezolizumab) plus anti-VEGF therapy (bevacizumab) in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Tatsuya Yamashita
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
206TiP - SIERRA: A phase IIIb, single-arm, multicentre study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab for first-line treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
207TiP - A two-arm randomized open-label prospective design superiority phase III clinical trial to compare the efficacy of docetaxel-oxaliplatin-capecitabine/ 5 -fluorouracil (DOC/F) followed by docetaxel versus CAPOX/mFOLFOX-7 in advanced gastric cancers
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
212P - Mutational landscape and characteristics of ERBB2 in urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Mingwei Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
213P - Prognostic significance of absolute lymphocyte count in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line combination immunotherapies: Results from the International metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium (IMDC)
Presenter: Kosuke Takemura
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
214P - Development and prospective validation of a multiplex RNA urine test for noninvasive detection and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Hua Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
215P - Real-world outcomes of first-line tislelizumab plus axitinib in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mnccRCC)
Presenter: Pei Dong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
216P - Preliminary efficacy and safety results from ‘ReBirth’: A phase II study of risk-based bladder-sparing therapy for MIBC
Presenter: Yijun Shen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract