Abstract 241P
Background
Cabozantinib is approved in first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), as a single agent and in combination with nivolumab. In real-world setting, only a miniscule proportion of Indian patients with mRCC manage to afford nivolumab, and majority of the patients end up receiving first-line cabozantinib monotherapy. Unfortunately, even though cabozantinib has been approved for long time, there is no published data from India regarding the experience of first-line cabozantinib in mRCC.
Methods
From February 2022 to August 2023, consecutive patients of mRCC who were treated with first-line cabozantinib monotherapy, were prospectively followed. Response rates, survival outcomes and toxicity were analyzed for patients who received at least 3 months of cabozantinib. The adverse events were classified based on the CTCAE v 4.0.
Results
Of the 21 mRCC patients, 18 (86%) were males. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range: 35-72); and 20 (95%) patients had clear cell histology. Most common site of metastasis was lungs (n=14) followed by bone (n=12), non-regional lymph nodes (n=6) and liver (n=3). Two patients had favorable risk disease, whereas 15 had intermediate risk and 4 had poor risk disease according to IMDC risk criteria. Dose reductions due to toxicity were required in 8 (38%) patients. At initial evaluation (3 months after treatment initiation), 20 patients had disease control (partial response in 3 and stable disease in 17 patients), while one had progression of disease. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range: 3–19); median progression free survival was not reached (total number of progression events = 5) and all patients were surviving. Toxicities of cabozantinib were grade 1 or 2 in 12 patients and grade 3 or 4 in 7 patients. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were diarrhea (n=3, 14.3%), hypertension (n=3, 14.3%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (n=2, 9.5%), stomatitis (n=1, 4.8%), and hepatic transaminitis (n=1, 4.8%).
Conclusions
Cabozantinib is a viable first-line option for Indian patients with mRCC. Keeping in mind the toxicity profile and need for dose reduction; starting with 40 mg daily dose and careful tailoring as per tolerance, seems to be practically more feasible in our setting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract