Abstract 267P
Background
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score serves as a promising biomarker to identify patients who are eligible for treatment with PARP inhibitor (PARPi). Previous studies have suggested a 3-biomarker Genomic Instability Score (GIS) threshold of ≥42 is a valid biomarker to predict response to PARPi in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the GIS threshold for prostate cancer (PCa) is still lacking. Here, we conducted an exploratory analysis to investigate an appropriate GIS score and to evaluate its ability to predict response to PARPi in prostate cancer patients.
Methods
A total of 225 patients with PCa were included in this study. Tumor tissue specimens were collected for targeted next-generation sequencing for homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and promoter methylation analysis. GIS score was calculated based on over 50,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) distributed across the human genome, incorporating three SNP-based assays: loss of heterozygosity, telomeric allelic imbalance, and large-scale state transition. The HRD score threshold was set at the 5th percentile of the GIS scores in our cohort of known BRCA1/2-deficient tumors which is the method used to define the HRD threshold in breast and ovarian cancer.
Results
In our cohort, 22 patients (9.78%) had BRCA1/2 mutations or BRCA1/2 promoter methylation, with additional 32 patients (14.22%) carrying mutations in HRR genes. The median HRD score was 2 (ranged from 0 to 78) in total cohort which is much lower than that of in breast and ovarian cancer. The 5th percentile of HRD scores was 9 in the BRCA1/2-deficient cohort and consequently high HRD was defined as HRD scores >9. In the 12 patients who received PARPi in our cohort, 8 patients with a high HRD score achieved a disease control rate of 83.3%. In addition, 4 patients with a low HRD score but with mutations in HRR genes other than BRCA1/2 achieved a disease control rate of 25.0%.
Conclusions
HRD positive, defined as GIS score >9, may be an appropriate threshold to predict the likelihood of response to PARPi in prostate cancer. Prospective, and large sample clinical trials will be needed to confirm our findings.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
J. Wang.
Funding
China Anti-Cancer Association-Hengrui PARP Inhibitor Cancer Research Fund (Phase I).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract