Abstract 611P
Background
The ESMO-MCBS provides a standardized assessment of the clinical benefit of a study treatment, considering factors such as overall survival and quality of life. We examined the profile of scores for trials of adjuvant therapy or potentially curative therapies presented at ASCO22 to assess the applicability of the MCBS.
Methods
Abstracts and prior or subsequent (until April 10, 2023) full publications of phase 3 trials on adjuvant therapy or curative treatment presented at ASCO22 were assessed using the MCBS v1.1 evaluation form 1. Scores were calculated based on overall survival, disease free survival or pathological complete response data and graded as A, B or C. Grades A and B indicate a substantial magnitude of clinical benefit. Two independent reviewers performed the grading; discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus with a third investigator.
Results
Thirty-five trials were evaluated, of which 11 could not be scored due to insufficient data or endpoint not gradable of the remaining 24 trials, 12 could not be graded due to statistically non-significant results. The remaining 12 trials were scored based on abstract alone (n= 6), or subsequent publication (n=6). A meaningful clinical benefit was seen in 11 of 12 trials (92%) with a score of A (n=9) or B (n=2), whereas 1 study had a score C.
Conclusions
Applying the current ESMO-MCBS to adjuvant and curative phase 3 trials presented at ASCO22 has significant limitations, due to the number of trials not able to be scored. This is a particular problem for studies with non-significant results. Adapting the score to allow grading of all trials may better assist clinicians and patients to assess the value of contemporary research.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
E. Segelov: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: ESMO-MCBS Working Group. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
16P - Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment: A discrete choice experiment
Presenter: Jiun-I Lai
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
17P - Initial outcomes of the ACT Now PRIME CARE for breast cancer: Prevention of Breast canceR (screening/ stage shifting) utilizing Integrated MobilE Clinics and pAtient Reported online Evaluations and Education
Presenter: Herdee Gloriane Luna
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
18P - Optimizing premenopausal HR+ HER2–ve eBC management in India: Insights from expert consensus
Presenter: Anitha Ramesh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
19P - Referral patterns among breast cancer patients in county-level hospitals in China
Presenter: Ping Lu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
20P - Real-world treatment of HER2+ and HR+/HER2- early breast cancer in county areas of China
Presenter: Ping Lu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
21P - Duration of breast cancer trials: Analysis of predicted versus actual completion date
Presenter: Daniëlle Verschoor
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
22P - Impact of an online Asian genetic risk calculator on risk perception: Cancer-related distress and uptake of genetic counselling among Malaysian breast cancer patients (The ARiCa Study)
Presenter: HEAMANTHAA Padmanabhan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
23P - Consensus statements and expert recommendations for BRCAm breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region (STREAM-AP)
Presenter: Soo Chin Lee
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
24P - Germline genetic testing for hereditary cancer: A retrospective analysis in a single site referral centre in Malaysia
Presenter: Vivian Lee
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
25P - Clinical presentations and prognostication of HER2-low breast cancer in Taiwan
Presenter: Bo-Fang Chen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract