Abstract 240P
Background
The efficacy of first-line combination immuno-oncology therapy (IO) with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma was demonstrated in the international phase III randomized CheckMate-214 trial. We also realized that the prognosis of Inter/Poor risk metastatic renal cancer could be extended in real clinical practice.
Methods
At Juntendo Univ. Hosp., Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab was used as first-line combination therapy for total 30 patients, including 27 patients with real-world Inter/Poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma from Jan/2019 to Aug/2023 and 3 patients enrolled in the international phase III study CheckMate-214. Efficacy in overall survival and safety, mainly immune-related adverse events(irAE), were retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Median age was 63 years (27-79), 37% (11/30) had prior nephrectomy. The most common metastatic lesions were lung (60%), bone (47%), and lymph node (37%). Three cases of hemodialysis were also included. The IMDC risk classification was Favor: Inter: Poor =2: 18: 10 cases. Total 80% (24/30) of cases were able to complete 4 cycles of ipilimumab. The average duration of IO treatment was 15.8 months (2-63). And the average duration of response was 27.3 months (2-92). During the mean follow-up period of 26.5 months (2-94), 6 cases died from cancer and 2 deaths from other causes. Among the cancer death cases, 4 of 6 cases were non-clear cell RCC. Deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy (DCN) could be performed in 2 cases in which metastatic lesions were controlled by IO-combo therapy. DCN was also performed in one patient withdrawn due to irAE, and surgical complete response (CR) was obtained. A total of 23% (7/30) had irAEs that forced IO administration to be discontinued. For irAEs of endocrine disorders, such as adrenal insufficiency and diabetes type 1, IO treatment could be continued with appropriate hormone replacement.
Conclusions
IO-Combo treatment for metastatic RCC was performed effectively and safely in Japanese patients. Surgical CR may be achieved with DCN after IO combination therapy even in poor-risk patients, but there is a possibility that Ipilimumab plus Nivolumab treatment has weak efficacy for non-clear cell RCC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract