Abstract 141P
Background
Patients with unresectable upper GI cancers have limited therapies and a dismal prognosis. While granting access to additional treatments, enrollment in phase I trials offers unclear benefits in this population.
Methods
Individual patient data of subjects with advanced upper GI cancers receiving ≥1 dose of the study drug within phase I trials at SCRI UK between 2011-2023 were collected. Objective response rate (ORR: CR+PR), clinical benefit rate (CBR: % with any tumor shrinkage), and disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+SD) were assessed by RECIST v1.1, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from trial start. Outcomes were reported using descriptive statistics and uni- and multivariate analyses. Subjects participating in more than one trial (n=20) were assessed separately in each study.
Results
Of 1796 patients screened, 104 patients with upper GI cancers (65% esophageal/junctional; 35% gastric) from 35 phase I trials were included. Most were male (75%), had adenocarcinoma (91%), and stage IV at diagnosis (73%). At trial entry, median age was 61 (range 20-86), median number of prior lines 2 (range 1-4), and median number of metastatic sites 2 (range 1-5). Seventy-four (60%), 37 (30%), and 13 (10%) received immunotherapy (IO), small molecules, or antibody-drug conjugates, respectively; 27 (22%) received a molecularly matched therapy. Median follow-up was 14.8 months (95% CI, 10.39-68.15). ORR was 17% (95% CI, 0.10-0.26), CBR 43% (95% CI, 0.33-0.53), and DCR 87% (95% CI, 0.79-0.93) across all trials. Efficacy was comparable by number of prior lines, trial drugs, or allocation to matched therapy. In response-evaluable patients across all trials (n=100), median OS and PFS were 12.3 (95% CI, 7.77-16.88) and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.45-3.40), respectively, and were significantly longer for responders versus non-responders (both p<0.001). Depth of response, low metastatic burden (≤2 sites), and IO combos remained significant predictors of improved survival in multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Participation in phase I trials offers substantial benefits in refractory upper GI cancers regardless of biomarker selection with compelling results in late-line settings and potential early access to newly approved therapies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract