Abstract 182P
Background
Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) with peritoneal carcinomatosis is associated with poor prognosis with median overall survival surfacing under the one-year mark. The treatment of gastric cancer remains controversial. Using hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in combination with cytoreductive surgery may help reduce mortality rates. This study attempted to investigate treatment modalities available for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma.
Methods
We extracted all adult patients with intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma with 7th edition AJCC M1 stage (2010-2015) using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients with extra-peritoneal metastasis were excluded. We stratified patients into four different groups: surgery, chemotherapy, surgery and chemotherapy, and no surgery/no chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression models were utilized to access overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
Results
A total of 243 patients were identified. The median (OS) of the entire cohort was 11 months. Patients who received both chemotherapy and surgery, chemotherapy alone, and surgery alone had higher median (OS) compared to no treatment [19, 13, and 6 months, respectively, vs 3 months, p<0.001], as well as a higher (CSS) (p<0.0001). Patients who received no therapy had a statistically significant risk of overall mortality compared to the chemotherapy and surgery group [HR= 9.28 (5.40 -15.94). p<0.001], and compared to other treatment groups (p<0.001). N3B Stage was a significant risk factor for (OS) and (CSS) [HR= 2.69 (1.23 -5.78), p<0.013]. Table: 182P
Median overall survival
N | Events | Median survival | 95% CI | |
Overall Survival (OS) | ||||
No treatment administered | 56 | 54 | 3 | (2- 5) |
Chemotherapy alone | 91 | 86 | 13 | (11- 17) |
Surgery alone | 32 | 29 | 6 | (3- 16) |
Both chemotherapy and surgery | 64 | 55 | 19 | (16- 29) |
Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS) | ||||
No treatment administered | 56 | 53 | 3 | (2- 5) |
Chemotherapy alone | 87 | 75 | 13 | (11-18) |
Surgery alone | 30 | 21 | 15 | (4-43) |
Both chemotherapy and surgery | 62 | 49 | 19 | (16-31) |
Conclusions
The combined usage of surgery and chemotherapy significantly improved the median overall and cancer-specific survival for (GA) patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract