Abstract 111P
Background
In China, fruquintinib is approved for third-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC). There are no prospective randomized controlled studies comparing the efficacy of fruquintinib and fruquintinib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib monotherapy versus combination with ICIs in MSS mCRC.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed mCRC patients who received fruquintinib in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2020 to January 2022. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. The secondary endpoints were objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).
Results
A total of 184 patients with mCRC were included in this study, and 61 patients received ICIs combined with fruquintinib. Most patients received second line and above treatment before the study treatment. The ORR of fruquintinib combined with ICIs group (Group A, n=61) and fruquintinib group (Group B, n=123) were 14.3% and 3.6%; the DCR were 55.1% and 39.8%, respectively. Group A had a significant longer median PFS than Group B (3.9 months vs 3.3 months, P=0.015). However, the median OS was no significant difference between the two groups (mOS: 9.3 months vs 7.9 months, P=0.414). In the third line and above, there was no statistically significant difference in OS and PFS between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that baseline liver metastasis and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)of≥313.3 were associated with shorter PFS in those 184 patients. Adverse effects of two groups were generally similar (91.8% vs 93.2%, P=0.738), and the most common adverse effects of two groups were the hand–foot skin reaction, hoarseness and hypertension. The probability of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)of grade 3 or higher was broadly similar in both groups (14.1% vs 14.6%, P=0.916).
Conclusions
In the real world, there was no difference in OS and in the incidence of adverse events between patients with MSS mCRC patients treated with fruquintinib monotherapy versus in combination with ICIs.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04005066.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract