Abstract 10P
Background
Multi-gene expression tests have been widely accepted as risk-prediction tools in early-stage HR-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer (EBC) after surgery. This study compared the performance of the 28-gene panel that developed from the Asian breast cancer population with the 70-gene panel in Chinese women with EBC.
Methods
Pts with EBC, previously undergone 70-gene testing after primary surgery from Jan 2019 to Oct 2022 were enrolled. FFPE of primary breast tumors were collected for 28-gene testing. Clinicopathological risk factors such as diagnosed age ≤40y, ≥T2, N1, LVI positive, grade III, Ki-67≥ 20% were included in the final analyses. Pts with clinicopathological risk factors ≥2 were clinical high-risk (n=48); others were low-risk (n=51).
Results
A total of 99 Chinese pts with EBC (pT1-2N0-1 or pT3N0M0) were enrolled in this study, with a median diagnosed age of 52 years (29-74 years). The median follow-up period was 38 months, and the last follow-up date was June 20, 2023. Two pts were lost to follow-up, but none recurred or died. The 28-gene and 70-gene panels detected high-risk pts (26% vs. 34%) and low-risk (73% vs. 65%), respectively. The overall agreement of the two tests was 72% (71/99). In addition, the 28-gene panel showed higher consistency with clinical-risk prediction than the 70-gene panel (Kappa: 0.51 vs. 0.39). Among them, the consistency of the 28-gene panel and 70-gene panel with the low clinical-risk prediction was 98% (50/51) and 84% (43/51), respectively; the high-risk prediction was 47% (25/48) and 54% (26/48), respectively. Table: 10P
Risk prediction comparison of 28-gene and 70-gene panels
| Characteristic | 28-gene (%) | Kappa | 70-gene (%) | Kappa | |||
| High-risk | Low-risk | High-risk | Low-risk | ||||
| Clinical | High-risk | 25(25) | 23(23) | 0.51 | 26(26) | 22(22) | 0.39 |
| Low-risk | 1(1) | 50(51) | P<0.001 | 8(8) | 43(43) | P<0.001 | |
| Total | 26(26) | 73(74) | 99(100) | 34(34) | 65(66) | 99(100) |
Conclusions
The performance of the 28-gene panel in risk prediction of EBC was comparable with the 70-gene panel. The 28-gene panel could identify a more low-risk population in Chinese breast cancer pts. An enlarged sample size and longer follow-up for clinical outcomes will further confirm our conclusions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFE0196500).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract