Abstract 481P
Background
Identifying actionable driver mutations via tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is paramount in treatment decisions for metastatic non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we elucidate the feasibility of CGP in early-stage NSCLC, and compare the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and mutation landscape using three different platforms.
Methods
Surgically resected NSCLC samples (N=96) collected between October 2011 and April 2020 at Yonsei Cancer Center were analyzed using whole-exome sequencing (WES) (Illumina DRAGEN, v3.8) (N=96), TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500, v2.0) (for research use only) (Illumina) (N=96), and Foundation One CDx Assay (F1CDx) (N=26) to assess the concordance in TMB calculation and targetable mutations. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were evaluated using Vectra Polaris (Akoya).
Results
The stage distribution after surgery was 80% I (N=77) and 20% II (N=19). Ninety-nine percent (N=95) were adenocarcinoma. All 96 samples were analyzed with WES and TSO500. Among these samples, 26 samples were analyzed with F1CDx. The median TMB with WES and TSO500 was 1.57 and 4.7 mut/Mb, respectively (p<0.05). The median TMB was 1.88, 5.5, 4 mut/Mb for WES, TSO500 and F1CDx, respectively (p=0.0048). Linear regression analysis of TMB values calculated using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between WES and TSO500 resulted in a R2=0.76. For PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of <1% (negative, N=18), ≥1% (low, N=68) and ≥ 50% (high, N=10), the CCC were 0.075, 0.79, and 0.95, respectively. The CCC values for TMB concordance were variable between 3 platforms (WES vs. TSO500, R2=0.87; WES v. F1CDx, R2=0.72; TSO500 vs. F1CDx, R2=0.84). Mutation landscape revealed EGFR mutation (51%, N=49) as the most common actionable driver mutation, comprising of L858R (N=22), E19del (N=20), and other non-common EGFR mutations (N=7).
Conclusions
F1CDx and TSO500 showed robust analytical performance for TMB assessment with TSO500 showing stronger concordance of TMB with high PD-L1 expression. As paradigm for early-resected NSCLC continues to evolve, understanding TMB and mutation landscape may help advance clinical outcomes for this subset of patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Yonsei Cancer Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract