Abstract 9P
Background
To evaluate clinicopathological features and prognosis in women with mucinous breast cancer (MBC), distinguishing between pure (PMC) and mixed (MMC) subtype.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of all 358 women with MBC treated at Vietnam National Cancer hospital from June 2015 to December 2020. PMC was defined by ≥ 90% mucinous components.
Results
We identified 358 women with MBC (245 PMC and 113 MMC) representing 2.7% of all 13,254 breast cancer patients. The proportion of stage I, II, III and IV were 34.9%, 50.8%, 10.4% and 3.9% respectively. 95.3% of patients were hormone receptor positive. The rate of HER2 overexpression is 12%, and only 1.4% of patients was treated with anti-HER2. 193 patients (53.9%) had chemotherapy (CT), including 55 patients (15.4%) treated in neoadjuvant setting. Among those received neoadjuvant CT, only 3 patients (5.5%) achieved pCR. Meanwhile, the rates of partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were 50.8%, 38.2% and 5.5% respectively. PMC patients were older (54.4±13.3 vs 51.1±13.1 years), had lower Ki67 expression, lower incidence of nodal metastasis (N+) than MMC patients (p values <0.05). At median follow-up of 58 months, the 5-year overall survival rate of non-metastatic patients was 86.6%. Univariate analysis revealed that significant factors for poorer OS were MMC subtype (p=0.02), large tumor size (T) (p<0.001), N+ (p<0.001), HER2 overexpression (p<0.001), PR negative (p=0.02), and high Ki67 (p=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed nodal metastasis (N+) to be the most significant prognostic factor (HR=3.3; 95%CI 1.5-7.1), followed by high T stage (HR=2.9; 95%CI 1.4-6.3), HER2 overexpression (HR=2.5; 95%CI 1.2-5.3) and MMC subtype (HR=1.9; 95%CI 1.0-3.9). Amongst 245 patients with stage T1-2N0M0, 40.8% of those treated with CT related to worse overall survival (5-year OS 88.0% vs 95.6%, p=0.04).
Conclusions
The majority of MBC are luminal subtypes and associated with good prognosis. Poor prognostic factors of women with MBC are high T, N stage, HER2 overexpression and MMC subtype. Chemotherapy in stage T1-2N0M0 brings a worse survival outcome compared to endocrine therapy. Given the low response rate to neoadjuvant CT, upfront surgery is appropriate for MBC patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract