Abstract 218P
Background
Adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival (DFS) among MIUC patients (pts). CheckMate 274 study demonstrated adjuvant immunotherapy improved DFS in MIUC pts. However, few studies explored the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in MIUC pts. Our real-world study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy in high-risk MIUC pts.
Methods
Clinical data of high-risk MIUC pts between October 2016 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. After radical surgery, pT3/4 and pN+ MIUC pts without prior neoadjuvant therapy received adjuvant tislelizumab combined with GC (T+GC) or GC. In T+GC group, pts firstly received cisplatin 70 mg/m2 D2, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 D1 and D8 every 3 weeks for 2-6 cycles, then received tislelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for 2-17 cycles. In GC group, pts received cisplatin 70 mg/m2 D2, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 D1 and D8 every 3 weeks for 2-6 cycles. The primary outcome was DFS, and secondary outcomes were OS and safety.
Results
The median follow-up was 17.7(2.1-38.3) months, totally 117 MIUC pts were analyzed, with a median age of 64 (34-85) years. 75.2% were male, 46.2% were UTUC, 20.5% were variant histology; pT3=58.9%, pT4=17.1%; pN+=52.1%. In T+GC group (n=68), the mean number of tislelizumab cycles was 4 and GC cycles was 2.7. In GC group (n=49), the mean number of GC cycles was 2.9. The T+GC group (n=68) had a significantly longer DFS compared with the GC group (n=49) (median DFS (95% CI): 19.1 (6.0-32.5) vs 8.4 (1.0-39.4) months, HR=0.172, P<0.001). While lymphovascular invasion pts had a lower probability of DFS (HR=22.1 (2.8-173.5), P=0.003). The OS was longer in the T+GC group (n=68) (median OS (95% CI): 20.1(6.0-32.5) vs 12.2(1.5-39.4) months, P=0.186). Longer follow-up was required to determine the OS benefits in T+GC group. Grade 1-2 immune related adverse events including pruritus (n=10), ALT/AST increased (n=8), hyperthyroidism (n=5) and hyperglycaemia (n=3).
Conclusions
Our data demonstrated effectiveness of tislelizumab combined with GC as adjuvant therapy for pT3/4 and pN+ MIUC pts in real world.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract