Abstract 266P
Background
We aimed to report the somatic mutation profiles in Chinese mCRPC patients using blood-based liquid biopsy with next-generation sequencing (NGS), and to investigate associations between NGS results and physician practices in a real-life setting.
Methods
Patients with mCRPC who had clinical, biochemical, or radiologic disease progression and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level > 20 ng/mL after first-line systemic therapy were enrolled from 5 centers in Hong Kong. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using FoundationOne™ Liquid CDx. NGS results and pre- and post-NGS treatments were analyzed.
Results
This study included 36 patients (median age, 72.5 yr; median PSA, 69.9 ng/mL): 29 (80.6%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1; one-third had a Gleason score of 9; 28 (77.8%) had symptomatic disease; 7 (19.4%) and 15 (41.7%) received two and three lines of systemic therapies, respectively. Common genomic alterations were found in AR (52.8%), TP53 (44.4%), DNMT3A (33.3%), and BRCA2 (25.0%). Amplification and single-nucleotide variants were detected in 31.6% (6/19) and 47.4% (9/19) of the AR variants, respectively. The most common mutations in homologous recombination repair-related genes were found in BRCA2 (25.0%), CDK12 (19.4%), and ATM (8.3%), at comparable frequencies to those in the PROfound trial (NCT02987543). High microsatellite instability was detected in 2 (5.6%) patients. The overall median tumor mutational burden was 4.0 mut/Mb, 4/9 patients with variant BRCA2 were switched to a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, and all showed clinical benefits. The reasons for not using a PARP inhibitor included poor performance status (n = 2), cost (n = 1), and patient decision (n = 1).
Conclusions
Half of a cohort of Chinese patients with mCRPC who failed first-line therapy had AR mutations. BRCA2 mutations were detected in 9 (25.0%) patients, 4 of whom were switched to a PARP inhibitor and benefited clinically. In a real-life situation, liquid biopsy could potentially impact physician practices as well as patient outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract