Abstract 163P
Background
Gall Bladder Cancers(GBC) comprise a feared entity among all oncologists. Advanced stage of disease at presentation and grave prognosis despite use of all the armamentarium has led to GBC patients faring worse than other sites of malignancy.The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced unresectable gallbladder carcinoma.
Methods
This was a randomized control study done in Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur from 1st August 2017 to 31st July 2019. All histopathologically confirmed locally advanced unresectable carcinoma gall bladder patients were enrolled in this study. Patients who refused to give consent, metastatic disease and Child Pugh Score C were excluded. Patients who received any treatment for obstructiion was also excluded from the study. All patients were randomized into two arms. In Arm A, patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy and in Arm B patients received external beam radiotherapy. Treatment response of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy were assessed using RECIST Criteria Version1.1. Early radiation toxicity was assessed during treatment using RTOG grading. Chemotherapy toxicity was assessed using NCI-CTCAE Criteria (version 4.03). The study was carried out after obtaining approval from the Research Ethics Board. Written informed consent was taken from all the patients before enrolment of the study.
Results
Baseline characteristics of patients are listed in the table. Symptomatic response after one month of treatment in chemotherapy and radiotherapy arm were 80.7% and 61.4%. Overall response rate in chemotherapy arm was 38.4% in chemotherapy arm while 26.8% in radiotherapy arm. Median progression free survival in chemotherapy and radiotherapy arm were 7.24 vs 6.11 months (p= 0.034) respectively. Table: 163P
Chemotherapy arm (n=30) | Radiotherapy arm (n=30) | |
Median age | 61 years | 61 years |
Gender | ||
Male | 6 (20%) | 4 (13.3%) |
Female | 24 (80%) | 26 (86.7%) |
KPS | ||
>80% | 13 (43.3%) | 13 (43.3%) |
<60% | 17 (56.66%) | 17 (56.66%) |
History of cholelithiasis | 19 (63.3%) | 20 (66.7%) |
Clinical presentation | ||
Jaundice | 7 (23%) | 10 (33%) |
Abdominal pain | 6 (20%) | 7 (23%) |
Abdominal mass | 2 (7%) | 9 (30%) |
Ascites | 10 (33%) | 0 |
Nausea/vomit | 5 (17%) | 4 (13%) |
Stage | ||
IIIA | 7 (11.7%) | 5 (8.7%) |
IIIB | 13 (21.7%) | 12 (20%) |
IV | 10 (16.7%) | 13 (21.7%) |
Response | ||
Complete response | 1 (3.8%) | 1 (3.8%) |
Partial response | 9 (34.6%) | 6 (23%) |
Stable disease | 11 (42.3%) | 9 (34.6%) |
Progressive disease | 5 (19.2%) | 10 (38.4%) |
Conclusions
In advanced inoperable gallbladder cancer chemotherapy has better response rates and survival outcomes compared to radiotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
16P - Patient and healthcare practitioner preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment: A discrete choice experiment
Presenter: Jiun-I Lai
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
17P - Initial outcomes of the ACT Now PRIME CARE for breast cancer: Prevention of Breast canceR (screening/ stage shifting) utilizing Integrated MobilE Clinics and pAtient Reported online Evaluations and Education
Presenter: Herdee Gloriane Luna
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
18P - Optimizing premenopausal HR+ HER2–ve eBC management in India: Insights from expert consensus
Presenter: Anitha Ramesh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
19P - Referral patterns among breast cancer patients in county-level hospitals in China
Presenter: Ping Lu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
20P - Real-world treatment of HER2+ and HR+/HER2- early breast cancer in county areas of China
Presenter: Ping Lu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
21P - Duration of breast cancer trials: Analysis of predicted versus actual completion date
Presenter: Daniëlle Verschoor
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
22P - Impact of an online Asian genetic risk calculator on risk perception: Cancer-related distress and uptake of genetic counselling among Malaysian breast cancer patients (The ARiCa Study)
Presenter: HEAMANTHAA Padmanabhan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
23P - Consensus statements and expert recommendations for BRCAm breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region (STREAM-AP)
Presenter: Soo Chin Lee
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
24P - Germline genetic testing for hereditary cancer: A retrospective analysis in a single site referral centre in Malaysia
Presenter: Vivian Lee
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
25P - Clinical presentations and prognostication of HER2-low breast cancer in Taiwan
Presenter: Bo-Fang Chen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract