Abstract 603P
Background
Glioblastoma is a malignant brain tumour with a high recurrence rate following stanadard first-line treatment. While there are currently guidelines from NICE and EANO on the postoperative surveillance intervals for these patients, they were not evidence-based, and the quality of such recommendations remains untested. We therefore set out to provide an evidence-based recommendation on the optimal postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for glioblastoma patients after surgical treatment, tailored based on the extent of surgical resection and completion of adjuvant treatment.
Methods
This was a territory-wide, multicentre retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma treated with surgery and radiotherapy (RT) across seven neurosurgical units in Hong Kong between 2006-2020 (n=228). Data were extracted from the Hong Kong Glioblastoma Registry (HK-GBM Registry). Interval-censored Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for the stratified groups based on the event-free survival of included patients, defined as time from the start date of RT to the occurrence of any event (tumour progression or death). A piecewise exponential model with different hazard functions in predefined time intervals was used to describe each curve. Accordingly, adopting a 15% event rate criterion, we generated the surveillance schedules.
Results
For a 15% event yield each scan (15% event rate criterion), we propose that glioblastoma patients treated with gross total resection be monitored with MRIs around every 9 weeks until 86 weeks after starting RT. Meanwhile, patients with residual tumour after surgery should be monitored more frequently at every 7 weeks until 75 weeks after RT initiation; and the interval should be further shortened to every 4 weeks for patients who were unable to complete the standard 6-weeks concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Conclusions
Radiological surveillance is an important tool to detect postoperative tumour progression. The extent of surgical resection and completion of adjuvant treatment are major factors associated with glioblastoma progression and the frequency of radiological surveillance should therefore be guided by these two factors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Hong Kong Neuro-oncology Society.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
601P - Pembrolizumab in patients of Chinese descent with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient advanced solid tumors: KEYNOTE-158
Presenter: Xiaohua Wu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract