Abstract 306P
Background
Optimal adjuvant treatment for stage IA uterine papillary serous (UPSC) or clear cell carcinomas (UCCC) remains unknown. Options include no adjuvant treatment or systemic chemotherapy, Pelvic RT and Vaginal brachytherapy alone or in combination. These subtypes represent an infrequent set of patients, and hence there is lack of randomized trial data to guide optimal management. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment patterns and relapse characteristics in this uncommon subtype based on the retrospective data from a single centre.
Methods
Clinicopathologic data, treatment patterns and relapse characteristics were retrospectively collected on patients of UPSC and UCCC treated between January 2014 and December 2018. Adjuvant treatment modalities used and their impact on relapse rates was analysed.
Results
We identified 21 patients who had undergone hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and were found to have stage 1A papillary serous or clear cell endometrial carcinoma. Nearly all patients (n-18, 85%) also underwent extended lymph node dissection of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes.
Median age at diagnosis was 61 years. Eighteen patients had uterine papillary serous carcinoma and three patients had clear cell histology. Eleven patients (52%) received systemic chemotherapy (six cycles of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin) with RT. and two patients received EBRT with or without VBT. Eight patients had no adjuvant treatment. At a median follow-up thirty months (range 6-63 months), six patient had experienced recurrences (28%). Nearly all the recurrences (n = 4) were in patients who received no adjuvant therapy with a relapse rate of 50% (4/8) in this subset. Four recurrences were distant metastasis while two were loco regional. At the time of last follow up, three patients with relapse had succumbed to their disease.
Conclusions
UPSC and UCCC are a distinct subtype of endometrial cancer and associated with an aggressive phenotype and high relapse rate even in patients with early stage. Systemic chemotherapy and Pelvic RT alone or in combination should always be considered in this group.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract