Abstract 327TiP
Background
Management of platinum resistant ovarian cancer has always been challenging for oncologists. Best option in this setting is single agent chemotherapy with bevacizumab. However, due to various contraindications and financial constraints, many of them do not receive bevacizumab. Due to high expression of folate receptor alpha in high grade epithelial ovarian cancers pemetrexed could be a potential treatment option. To our knowledge there are only 2 phase II trials across the globe showing the effectiveness of pemetrexed in platinum resistant/refractory ovarian cancer and till date there is no prospective data in Indian patients with platinum resistant/refractory ovarian cancer.
Trial design
The study is a single centre, investigator-initiated, single arm phase II clinical trial designed using Simon two stage optimal design. Eligible patients are adults (age ≥18 years), with histologically confirmed high grade epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer, who have relapsed within 6 months of platinum-based chemotherapy, who are bevacizumab ineligible, with ECOG performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, with either measurable disease with at least one target lesion for response evaluation as per RECIST 1.1 criteria or non-measurable disease with CA-125 level ≥2 times ULN measured at least 2 weeks before enrolment. Estimated sample size is 63. At least 2 out of 22 responses in stage I are expected in order to proceed to stage II and further recruitment of the patients. Baseline contrast enhanced CT scan of chest, abdomen and pelvis along with CA-125 level will be recorded. Eligible patients will receive Pemetrexed at dose of 500 mg/m2 every 21 days. Response assessment will be done after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (RECIST 1.1 will be used for measurable disease and GCIG criteria using CA-125 level will be used for non-measurable disease) and subsequent responses will be assessed every 12-16 weeks. Treatment will continue until progression, intolerable toxicity or death. Primary objective is Objective Response Rate (ORR). Secondary objectives are Progression Free survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Toxicity profile and Quality of Life (QoL).
Clinical trial identification
CTRI/2022/08/044939.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract