Abstract 50P
Background
Breast Cancer is the most diagnosed cancer type worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women. Anti-HER2 treatment has shifted the treatment paradigm of HER2-positive tumors. Historically, only breast cancer patients with HER2 IHC score of 3+ or with HER2 gene (FISH) amplification have benefited from anti-HER2 agents. However, emerging evidence suggests that even a minimal amplification of HER2 may significantly impact response to therapy and prognosis. This led to the introduction of the new concept of HER2-low breast cancers. Our retrospective analysis aims to unveil the impact of HER2 low expression on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in non-metastatic HER2-negative breast cancers.
Methods
All patients’ profiles with non-metastatic, HER2-negative breast cancers who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery between the 1st of January 2018 and the 30th of August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into HER2-low and HER2-negative groups based on IHC score and FISH amplification. To compare the two study groups, patients’ response was clinically evaluated using surgical pathology reports. The primary endpoint was the response to NACT reported as the objective response rate (ORR) of HER2-low and HER2-negative tumors.
Results
Out of 262 patients, 236 patients had a response. Among the responders, 32 patients (14%) in the HER2-low group had a complete response compared to 4 patients (14%) in the HER2-negative group, OR 0.7 (95% CI:0.2 – 3), p-value= 0.6. While 132 patients (57%) and 17 patients (59%) had a partial response in the HER2-low and HER2-negative groups respectively, OR 0.7 (95% CI:0.2 – 2), p-value= 0.5. Across both groups, more patients with hormone-positive tumors had a response compared to hormone-negative tumors (p-value=0.01).
Conclusions
Preliminary results did not show any statistically significant impact of HER2 low expression on neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Nonetheless, statistical significance was observed relative to hormone expression, in accordance with the published literature.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Medical Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
623P - Advances in methylation analysis of liquid biopsy in early cancer detection of colorectal and lung cancer
Presenter: Sam Martin
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
624P - Pan-cancer single-cell isoform atlas: Unraveling isoform dynamics in cancer immunotherapy
Presenter: Lu Pan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
625P - The association of tumor marker concentration and air pollution in cancer survivors and the general population
Presenter: Kyae Hyung Kim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
626P - Percentage of cancer patients undergoing adjusted targeted therapy after ctDNA testing: Insights from a tertiary hospital experience
Presenter: Jisook Yim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
627P - Racial disparities in synchronous and metachronous colorectal and prostate cancer: SEER based study 2000-2020
Presenter: Taha Nagib
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract