Abstract 50P
Background
Breast Cancer is the most diagnosed cancer type worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women. Anti-HER2 treatment has shifted the treatment paradigm of HER2-positive tumors. Historically, only breast cancer patients with HER2 IHC score of 3+ or with HER2 gene (FISH) amplification have benefited from anti-HER2 agents. However, emerging evidence suggests that even a minimal amplification of HER2 may significantly impact response to therapy and prognosis. This led to the introduction of the new concept of HER2-low breast cancers. Our retrospective analysis aims to unveil the impact of HER2 low expression on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in non-metastatic HER2-negative breast cancers.
Methods
All patients’ profiles with non-metastatic, HER2-negative breast cancers who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and underwent surgery between the 1st of January 2018 and the 30th of August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into HER2-low and HER2-negative groups based on IHC score and FISH amplification. To compare the two study groups, patients’ response was clinically evaluated using surgical pathology reports. The primary endpoint was the response to NACT reported as the objective response rate (ORR) of HER2-low and HER2-negative tumors.
Results
Out of 262 patients, 236 patients had a response. Among the responders, 32 patients (14%) in the HER2-low group had a complete response compared to 4 patients (14%) in the HER2-negative group, OR 0.7 (95% CI:0.2 – 3), p-value= 0.6. While 132 patients (57%) and 17 patients (59%) had a partial response in the HER2-low and HER2-negative groups respectively, OR 0.7 (95% CI:0.2 – 2), p-value= 0.5. Across both groups, more patients with hormone-positive tumors had a response compared to hormone-negative tumors (p-value=0.01).
Conclusions
Preliminary results did not show any statistically significant impact of HER2 low expression on neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Nonetheless, statistical significance was observed relative to hormone expression, in accordance with the published literature.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Medical Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract