Abstract 475P
Background
Lobectomy had long been the established gold standard curative surgery for early stage lung cancer. With emerging evidence on the non-inferior outcome of segmentectomy, we had been performing segmentectomy on selected stage 1 lung cancer patients in our institution since 2012. It is timely for us to review our experience with segmentectomy in this group of patients.
Methods
We reviewed all the patients in our institution who underwent curative lung resection in a mixed Asian population over a 12-year period between 2006 and 2017. Staging was based on AJCC TNM 6th edition for patients before 2010 and 7th edition for patients after 2010. Only patients with stage 1 lung cancer were included in our study.
Results
269 patients were included in our study. 39 patients (14.5%) underwent segmentectomy, 225 patients (83.6%) underwent lobectomy and 5 patients (1.9%) underwent pneumonectomy. None of the segmentectomy cases had any visceral pleura or lymph node involvement reported on final histology. There was no significant difference in the mean duration of follow up between patients who had segmentectomy (5.37 +/- 2.94 years) and those who had lobectomy and above (6.41 +/- 3.43 years) (p = 0.083). Segmentectomy was associated with a significantly lower recurrence rate (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.75) and a 5-year disease free survival of 96.6% compared to 73.1% in lobectomy patients (p = 0.002). The time to recurrence was also longer in segmentectomy patients (mean 4.25 +/- 3.53 years vs 2.78 +/- 2.23 years) but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.371). There was no significance difference in the short term 30-day survival between patients who underwent segmentectomy and lobectomy and above. There was also no significant difference in survival at 1, 3 and 5 years between the 2 groups of patients.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrated good disease-free survival in patients who underwent segmentectomy with no significant differences in overall survival. It is likely that careful selection of patients will produce equally good outcome in segmentectomy patients and this can give us renewed confidence in moving forward with lung preservation surgery for patients with early stage lung cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract