Abstract 87P
Background
Esophageal cancer is a global health problem claiming more than 500,000 lives annually. Our previous research on other cancers has shown that patients living in rural areas have worse outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the geographic and socio-demographic disparities in esophageal cancer patients.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study on esophageal cancer patients between 1975 and 2016 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Both univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Socio-demographic factors, including the location of residence [metro area (MA) or rural area (RA)], gender, race, insurance status, and marital status, were analyzed.
Results
A total of 50,097 [RA, N =6,199(12%); MA, N =43,222(88%)] patients were included. During the study period, the incidence and mortality rates were consistently higher in RA vs. MA. Patients living in RA more commonly had adenocarcinoma (64.2% vs. 56.9%, p<0.01) compared to MA. Univariate and multivariable analysis showed that RA had worse OS (multivariate HR = 1.08; p <0.01) and DSS (multivariate HR = 1.07; p <0.01) compared to MA. Similarly, males, single and uninsured patients had worse OS and DSS compared to females, married, and insured patients, respectively. When comparing racial backgrounds, non-Hispanic black (HR=1.19; p<0.01) and Hispanic patients (HR=1.05; p=0.028) had worse OS than their Caucasian counterparts.
Conclusions
Our study identified social and demographic disparities in esophageal cancer incidence and outcomes. Potential causes may include access to healthcare, diet, genetics, health behavior, and environmental factors. Future research is needed to understand and attenuate such disparities.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Funding
This research was funded by National Cancer Institute: P30CA016056.
Disclosure
S. Mukherjee: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Ipsen biopharmaceuticals; Non-Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Member of the Board of Directors: Esophageal Cancer Action Network. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
79P - Outcomes by baseline liver function in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab in the phase III HIMALAYA study
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster viewing 02
82P - A randomized controlled, open-label, adaptive phase III clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of EndoTAG-1 plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with measurable locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after FOLFIRINOX
Presenter: Muh-Hwan Su
Session: Poster viewing 02
83P - Impact of viral aetiology in the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster viewing 02
84P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large real life worldwide population
Presenter: Margherita Rimini
Session: Poster viewing 02
86P - Outcomes by primary tumour location in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in the phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster viewing 02
88P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as second-line therapy for metastatic or recurrent gallbladder carcinoma (GBC): A single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Qingbao Cheng
Session: Poster viewing 02