Abstract 87P
Background
Esophageal cancer is a global health problem claiming more than 500,000 lives annually. Our previous research on other cancers has shown that patients living in rural areas have worse outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the geographic and socio-demographic disparities in esophageal cancer patients.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study on esophageal cancer patients between 1975 and 2016 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Both univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Socio-demographic factors, including the location of residence [metro area (MA) or rural area (RA)], gender, race, insurance status, and marital status, were analyzed.
Results
A total of 50,097 [RA, N =6,199(12%); MA, N =43,222(88%)] patients were included. During the study period, the incidence and mortality rates were consistently higher in RA vs. MA. Patients living in RA more commonly had adenocarcinoma (64.2% vs. 56.9%, p<0.01) compared to MA. Univariate and multivariable analysis showed that RA had worse OS (multivariate HR = 1.08; p <0.01) and DSS (multivariate HR = 1.07; p <0.01) compared to MA. Similarly, males, single and uninsured patients had worse OS and DSS compared to females, married, and insured patients, respectively. When comparing racial backgrounds, non-Hispanic black (HR=1.19; p<0.01) and Hispanic patients (HR=1.05; p=0.028) had worse OS than their Caucasian counterparts.
Conclusions
Our study identified social and demographic disparities in esophageal cancer incidence and outcomes. Potential causes may include access to healthcare, diet, genetics, health behavior, and environmental factors. Future research is needed to understand and attenuate such disparities.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Funding
This research was funded by National Cancer Institute: P30CA016056.
Disclosure
S. Mukherjee: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Ipsen biopharmaceuticals; Non-Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Member of the Board of Directors: Esophageal Cancer Action Network. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
109P - Economic evaluation of second-line treatment for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review
Presenter: Gagandeep Kaur
Session: Poster viewing 02
110P - Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of poor prognosis in advanced esophageal cancer
Presenter: Chaichana Chantharakhit
Session: Poster viewing 02
111P - Bicentric real-life analysis of the molecular portrait of patients with early onset metastatic biliary tract cancer
Presenter: Theresa Schmalfuss
Session: Poster viewing 02
112P - Prognostic role of sarcopenia before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: A retrospective study
Presenter: Mastaneh Sanei
Session: Poster viewing 02
113P - Brain metastases in esophageal cancer patients who have been treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: An inconsiderable complication
Presenter: Jun Liu
Session: Poster viewing 02
114P - Risk factors for oesophageal fistula: A life-threatening complication of treatment for oesophageal cancer
Presenter: Reo Omori
Session: Poster viewing 02
115P - Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) expression status in patients with cholangiocarcinoma
Presenter: Thanit Imemkamon
Session: Poster viewing 02
116P - Spleen as an organ at risk (OAR) in adjuvant chemoradiotherapy of gastric cancer: Retrospective dosimetric single institutional experience
Presenter: Preethi Shetty
Session: Poster viewing 02
117P - Immunoprofile of adenosquamous carcinoma in gastric cancer
Presenter: Cheng-Han Wu
Session: Poster viewing 02
118P - Association between stomach cancer with behavioral and dietary factors: A case control study from Nepal
Presenter: Arun Shahi
Session: Poster viewing 02