Abstract 82P
Background
FOLFIRINOX is a global standard first-line (1L) treatment for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (APDAC), but the second-line option after its failure remains yet defined. Current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of EndoTAG-1 (paclitaxel in cationic liposomes) plus gemcitabine as a second-line treatment in APDAC after FOLFIRINOX.
Methods
Patients with histologically confirmed APDAC and failed to 1L FOLFIRINOX were eligible. Participants were stratified by disease stage (metastatic vs. locally advanced) and ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1) and then randomized 1:1 to receive either EndoTAG-1 22 mg/m2 twice weekly plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks (ET+Gem arm) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 alone (Gem arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of the intent-to-treat population.
Results
A total of 218 patients were enrolled: median age 62.0, 59.6% male, 52.8%/30.3% White/Asian, 86.7% metastatic diseases at enrollment, 44.5%/55.5% ECOG PS 0/1. Of the 108 subjects in the ET+Gem group and 110 subjects in the Gem group, six (5.6%) and eight (7.3%) did not receive assigned treatment, respectively. On intent-to-treat analysis, the median OS for patients in ET+Gem arm was 226 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 183-278) vs. 209 days (158-248) for Gem arm (p=0.665). The median PFS was 113 days (79-168) for the ET+Gem arm vs. 110 days (60-115) for the Gem armp (=0.435), whiles the objective response rate (ORR) in corresponding arm was 11.5% and 6.8%, respectively (p=0.263). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) grade 3 and above occurred in 82 patients (82/102, 80.4%) of the ET+Gem arm and 72 patients (72/102, 70.6%) in the Gem arm. Grade 5 / death related to TEAEs occurred for six patients (5.9%) in the ET+Gem arm and 11 patients (10.8%) in the Gem arm.
Conclusions
Add-on EndoTAG-1 did not significantly improve survival over gemcitabine alone in patients with FOLFIRINOX-refractory APDAC. No new safety issues were noted and the safety profile is manageable.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
SynCore Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Funding
SynCore Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
48P - Long-term clinical outcomes after the second metastasectomy in patients (pts) with resected metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Songji Choi
Session: Poster viewing 02
49P - Ramucirumab beyond progression plus TAS 102 in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or the gastroesophageal junction, after treatment failure on a ramucirumab based therapy: Final results of the phase II RE-ExPEL study
Presenter: Thorsten Goetze
Session: Poster viewing 02
50P - Linear tumor regression of rectal cancer in daily MRI during preoperative chemoradiotherapy: An insight of tumor regression velocity for personalized cancer therapy
Presenter: Sea-Won Lee
Session: Poster viewing 02
51P - Efficacy and safety of sintilimab as first-line therapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study
Presenter: Caiyun Nie
Session: Poster viewing 02
53P - Baseline PET/CT deep radiomics signature apply for identifying bevacizumab sensitivity of RAS-mutant colorectal cancer liver metastases patients
Presenter: Wenju Chang
Session: Poster viewing 02
54P - Efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Yakup Ergün
Session: Poster viewing 02
55P - Biodegradable and biocompatible 3D-printed scaffolds loaded with chemotherapy drugs: A new horizon for treatment of colon cancer with diffuse intraperitoneal metastasis
Presenter: Amirhosein Kefayat
Session: Poster viewing 02
56P - Clinico-pathological profile of adolescent and young adult colorectal cancer patients: Multicentre collaborative registry data from India
Presenter: Soumya Surath Panda
Session: Poster viewing 02