Abstract 96P
Background
Flot (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) is the standard regimen for perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer. Preoperative chemotherapy downstages the tumor, increases pathological response. Patients receiving flot are hospitalised for more than a day. This study compares it with dox (docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine) - a daycare regimen, as capecitabine has already been proven non-inferior to 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer.
Methods
62 patients were enrolled in this prospective observational study. 31 patients received 4 doses of 2 weekly infusions of 5-fluorouracil- 2600 mg/m2, leucovorin - 200 mg/m2, oxaliplatin - 85 mg/m2, docetaxel- 50 mg/m2 on day 1. Rest 31 received 3 doses of 3 weekly infusions of docetaxel- 60 mg/m2, oxaliplatin - 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and tablet capecitabine -1000 mg/m2 bid for 14 days. Radiological response to chemotherapy were analysed 2 weeks after chemotherapy completion and categorised into stable disease, partial response, progressive disease and complete response according to recist criteria version 1.1. Chi-square test was applied for analysis.
Results
In flot arm, 38.1 % (8) had partial response, 66.7 % (12) had progressive disease, 55 % (11) had stable disease radiologically. In dox arm, 61.9 %(13) had partial response, 33.3 % (6) had progressive disease, 45 % (9) had stable disease radiologically . 3 patients in dox regimen did not have evaluation (1 lost to follow-up; 2 died during the course of treatment). P value obtained was 0.197. The radiological response to chemotherapy was not statistically significant between two groups.
Conclusions
The radiological response to chemotherapy post flot or dox regimen is not statistically different. Dox maybe considered as an alternative regimen to flot in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients with the advantage being a daycare procedure, requiring less resources and manpower.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
79P - Outcomes by baseline liver function in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab in the phase III HIMALAYA study
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster viewing 02
82P - A randomized controlled, open-label, adaptive phase III clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of EndoTAG-1 plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with measurable locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after FOLFIRINOX
Presenter: Muh-Hwan Su
Session: Poster viewing 02
83P - Impact of viral aetiology in the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster viewing 02
84P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large real life worldwide population
Presenter: Margherita Rimini
Session: Poster viewing 02
86P - Outcomes by primary tumour location in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in the phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster viewing 02
87P - Socio-demographic disparities in esophageal cancer: A SEER analysis
Presenter: Beas Siromoni
Session: Poster viewing 02