Abstract 96P
Background
Flot (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) is the standard regimen for perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer. Preoperative chemotherapy downstages the tumor, increases pathological response. Patients receiving flot are hospitalised for more than a day. This study compares it with dox (docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine) - a daycare regimen, as capecitabine has already been proven non-inferior to 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer.
Methods
62 patients were enrolled in this prospective observational study. 31 patients received 4 doses of 2 weekly infusions of 5-fluorouracil- 2600 mg/m2, leucovorin - 200 mg/m2, oxaliplatin - 85 mg/m2, docetaxel- 50 mg/m2 on day 1. Rest 31 received 3 doses of 3 weekly infusions of docetaxel- 60 mg/m2, oxaliplatin - 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and tablet capecitabine -1000 mg/m2 bid for 14 days. Radiological response to chemotherapy were analysed 2 weeks after chemotherapy completion and categorised into stable disease, partial response, progressive disease and complete response according to recist criteria version 1.1. Chi-square test was applied for analysis.
Results
In flot arm, 38.1 % (8) had partial response, 66.7 % (12) had progressive disease, 55 % (11) had stable disease radiologically. In dox arm, 61.9 %(13) had partial response, 33.3 % (6) had progressive disease, 45 % (9) had stable disease radiologically . 3 patients in dox regimen did not have evaluation (1 lost to follow-up; 2 died during the course of treatment). P value obtained was 0.197. The radiological response to chemotherapy was not statistically significant between two groups.
Conclusions
The radiological response to chemotherapy post flot or dox regimen is not statistically different. Dox maybe considered as an alternative regimen to flot in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients with the advantage being a daycare procedure, requiring less resources and manpower.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
129P - Chemoradiation in carcinoma esophagus with weekly paclitaxel ad carboplatin: A real-world experience from a tertiary care center
Presenter: Nidhi Sharma
Session: Poster viewing 02
130P - Radiation induced lymphopenia (RAILs on time saves nine): In carcinoma esophagus
Presenter: Sheel Mohanty
Session: Poster viewing 02
131TiP - ASCEND: Randomized, double-blinded phase II study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel with CEND-1 or placebo in untreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG) trial ACTRN12621001290886
Presenter: Andrew Dean
Session: Poster viewing 02
134TiP - A phase I/II study of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus S-1 in metastatic pancreatic cancer after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy
Presenter: Hiroshi Imaoka
Session: Poster viewing 02