Abstract 318P
Background
EMPOWER-Lung 3 is a randomised, 2-part, Phase 3 study of 1L treatment of patients (pts) with advanced (Stage III/IV) squamous (SQ) or non-squamous (NSQ) NSCLC without actionable mutations (NCT03409614). The double-blind Part 2 of the study enrolled pts irrespective of PD-L1 levels and compared clinical activity and safety of cemiplimab, an anti-PD-1, plus (+) platinum-based chemo, versus (vs) placebo (PBO)+chemo.
Methods
Pts were randomised (2:1; stratified by histology and PD-L1 expression) to receive cemiplimab 350 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) or PBO Q3W for 108 weeks (or until progression), plus up to 4 cycles of chemo (followed by mandatory pemetrexed maintenance for NSQ pts assigned to a pemetrexed-containing regimen). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) per blinded independent central review. Here we report Part 2 results from the prespecified 2 interim analysis. Data cut-off was 14 June 2021.
Results
Overall, 466 pts were eligible and randomised to cemiplimab+chemo (n=312) or PBO+chemo (n=154). Median (range) age was 63.0 (25-84) years; 57.1% had NSQ NSCLC; and 85.2% had Stage IV disease. Median OS was 21.9 months with cemiplimab+chemo vs 13.0 months with PBO+chemo (HR, 0.71; P=0.014). Cemiplimab+chemo was associated with superior median PFS (8.2 vs 5.0 months; HR, 0.56), higher ORR (43.3% vs 22.7%), and longer median duration of response (DOR) (15.6 months vs 7.3 months) vs PBO+chemo (Table). Incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events was 43.6% in cemiplimab+chemo arm and 31.4% in PBO+chemo arm. Table: 318P
Cemiplimab+chemo (n=312) | PBO+chemo (n=154) | ||
Duration of follow-up, median (IQR), months | 16.3 (13.9–19.1) | 16.7 (14.2–19.0) | |
OS, median (95% CI), months | 21.9 (15.5–NE) | 13.0 (11.9–16.1) | |
HR (95% CI) | 0.71 (0.53–0.93); P=0.014 | ||
PFS, median (95% CI), months | 8.2 (6.4–9.3) | 5.0 (4.3–6.2) | |
HR (95% CI) | 0.56 (0.44–0.70); P<0.0001 | ||
ORR, % (95% CI) | 43.3 (37.7–49.0) | 22.7 (16.4–30.2) | |
Odds ratio (95% CI) | 2.68 (1.72–4.19); P<0.0001 | ||
Complete response, n (%) | 8 (2.6) | 0 (0) | |
Partial response, n (%) | 127 (40.7) | 35 (22.7) | |
Kaplan-Meier estimated DOR, median (95% CI), months | 15.6 (12.4–NE) | 7.3 (4.3–12.6) |
Conclusions
In pts with advanced NSCLC, 1L cemiplimab+chemo demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in OS, PFS, ORR and DOR vs chemo alone, with a safety profile consistent with cemiplimab monotherapy and platinum-based chemo.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03409614.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support was provided by Jenna Lee, MS of Prime, Knutsford, UK, funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi. Responsibility for all opinions, conclusions, and data interpretation lies with the authors.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi.
Funding
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi.
Disclosure
K.D. Penkov: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Roche. E. Kalinka: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar, Pfizer, Roche, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. C. Gessner: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. R. Passalacqua: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Pierre-Fabre. S. Li, K. McGuire, R.G. Quek, G. Gullo, P. Rietschel: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
364P - Tepotinib with an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutant MET-amplified NSCLC: A case series
Presenter: Azura Ahmad
Session: Poster viewing 05.
365P - Patterns of progression on first-line osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A Swiss cohort study
Presenter: Alexandra Schuler
Session: Poster viewing 05.
366P - EGFR amplification is a putative resistance mechanism for NSCLC-LM patients with TKI therapy and is associated with poor outcome
Presenter: Hainan Yang
Session: Poster viewing 05.
367P - High-dose aumolertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases: Primary data from ACHIEVE
Presenter: Yun Fan
Session: Poster viewing 05.
368P - A special Imaging pattern of bilateral diffuse metastases in advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations was associated with a favorable prognosis to EGFR-TKIs
Presenter: Zhen-Bang Gu
Session: Poster viewing 05.
370P - Outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC co-mutations receiving aumolertinib as first-line treatment: A retrospective study
Presenter: Fang Cun
Session: Poster viewing 05.
371P - Real-world data of first-line treatment with aumolertinib for elderly EGFR+ NSCLC patients
Presenter: Haitao Zhang
Session: Poster viewing 05.
373P - Safety and efficacy of aumolertinib treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations: Cohort 2
Presenter: WenFeng Fang
Session: Poster viewing 05.