Abstract 318P
Background
EMPOWER-Lung 3 is a randomised, 2-part, Phase 3 study of 1L treatment of patients (pts) with advanced (Stage III/IV) squamous (SQ) or non-squamous (NSQ) NSCLC without actionable mutations (NCT03409614). The double-blind Part 2 of the study enrolled pts irrespective of PD-L1 levels and compared clinical activity and safety of cemiplimab, an anti-PD-1, plus (+) platinum-based chemo, versus (vs) placebo (PBO)+chemo.
Methods
Pts were randomised (2:1; stratified by histology and PD-L1 expression) to receive cemiplimab 350 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) or PBO Q3W for 108 weeks (or until progression), plus up to 4 cycles of chemo (followed by mandatory pemetrexed maintenance for NSQ pts assigned to a pemetrexed-containing regimen). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) per blinded independent central review. Here we report Part 2 results from the prespecified 2 interim analysis. Data cut-off was 14 June 2021.
Results
Overall, 466 pts were eligible and randomised to cemiplimab+chemo (n=312) or PBO+chemo (n=154). Median (range) age was 63.0 (25-84) years; 57.1% had NSQ NSCLC; and 85.2% had Stage IV disease. Median OS was 21.9 months with cemiplimab+chemo vs 13.0 months with PBO+chemo (HR, 0.71; P=0.014). Cemiplimab+chemo was associated with superior median PFS (8.2 vs 5.0 months; HR, 0.56), higher ORR (43.3% vs 22.7%), and longer median duration of response (DOR) (15.6 months vs 7.3 months) vs PBO+chemo (Table). Incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events was 43.6% in cemiplimab+chemo arm and 31.4% in PBO+chemo arm. Table: 318P
Cemiplimab+chemo (n=312) | PBO+chemo (n=154) | ||
Duration of follow-up, median (IQR), months | 16.3 (13.9–19.1) | 16.7 (14.2–19.0) | |
OS, median (95% CI), months | 21.9 (15.5–NE) | 13.0 (11.9–16.1) | |
HR (95% CI) | 0.71 (0.53–0.93); P=0.014 | ||
PFS, median (95% CI), months | 8.2 (6.4–9.3) | 5.0 (4.3–6.2) | |
HR (95% CI) | 0.56 (0.44–0.70); P<0.0001 | ||
ORR, % (95% CI) | 43.3 (37.7–49.0) | 22.7 (16.4–30.2) | |
Odds ratio (95% CI) | 2.68 (1.72–4.19); P<0.0001 | ||
Complete response, n (%) | 8 (2.6) | 0 (0) | |
Partial response, n (%) | 127 (40.7) | 35 (22.7) | |
Kaplan-Meier estimated DOR, median (95% CI), months | 15.6 (12.4–NE) | 7.3 (4.3–12.6) |
Conclusions
In pts with advanced NSCLC, 1L cemiplimab+chemo demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in OS, PFS, ORR and DOR vs chemo alone, with a safety profile consistent with cemiplimab monotherapy and platinum-based chemo.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03409614.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support was provided by Jenna Lee, MS of Prime, Knutsford, UK, funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi. Responsibility for all opinions, conclusions, and data interpretation lies with the authors.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi.
Funding
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi.
Disclosure
K.D. Penkov: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Roche. E. Kalinka: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar, Pfizer, Roche, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. C. Gessner: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. R. Passalacqua: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Pierre-Fabre. S. Li, K. McGuire, R.G. Quek, G. Gullo, P. Rietschel: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
385P - Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer with HER2 mutations: A parallel, multi-center, multi-cohort patient-centric study (CTONG1702 and 1705)
Presenter: Si-Yang Liu
Session: Poster viewing 05.
386P - Efficacy of anlotinib in posterior line treatment of locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC with KRAS mutation
Presenter: Xin Li
Session: Poster viewing 05.
387P - Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) in combination with osimertinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated, c-met overexpressing, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Safety and efficacy results from phase Ib study
Presenter: Hidehito Horinouchi
Session: Poster viewing 05.
388P - Capmatinib in Chinese adults with EGFR wt, ALK rearrangement negative (ALK-R−), MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14), advanced NSCLC: Results from the phase II GEOMETRY-C study
Presenter: Yi-Long Wu
Session: Poster viewing 05.
389P - Updated efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in Chinese patients with advanced RET fusion+ non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Zhou Qing
Session: Poster viewing 05.
390P - Entrectinib in Japanese patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive (fp) NSCLC and NTRK-fp solid tumours
Presenter: Haruyasu Murakami
Session: Poster viewing 05.
391P - Demographics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A referral tertiary cancer centre experience from a low-middle income country
Presenter: Goutam Panda
Session: Poster viewing 05.
392P - A phase II study of SAF-189s in patients with advanced ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Jinji Yang
Session: Poster viewing 05.
394P - Research of the algorithm for rare driver genes in non-small cell lung cancer using pathological images and artificial intelligence
Presenter: Kiyotaka Yoh
Session: Poster viewing 05.
395P - Molecular landscape of Indian NSCLC: Is NGS the answer?
Presenter: Ullas Batra
Session: Poster viewing 05.