Abstract 146P
Background
Studies have classified muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) into primary (initially muscle-invasive, PMIBC) and secondary subtypes (initially non-muscle-invasive but progressed, SMIBC), in which controversial survival outcomes were demonstrated. However, a relevant Chinese cohort is yet to be reported.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with PMIBC or SMIBC at West China Hospital from January 2009 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher tests were employed to compare the baseline clinicopathological characteristics. Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox competing proportional risk model were used to compare the PMIBC and SMIBC survival outcomes. Then, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to reduce the bias caused by confounders and subgroup analysis was used to confirm the outcomes.
Results
A total of 405 MIBC patients were enrolled, including 286 PMIBC and 119 SMIBC patients, with a mean age of 64.66 years and 67.29 years and a mean follow-up of 27.54 months and 53.3 months, respectively. The SMIBC group had a higher proportion of older patients (17.65% vs. 9.09%), chronic disease (32.77% vs. 22.38%), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (19.33% vs. 8.04%). Before matching, SMIBC had a lower risk of overall mortality (OM) (hazard ratios [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–0.85, P = 0.005) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.94, P = 0.022) after the initial diagnosis. However, higher risks of OM (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02–2.10, P = 0.038) and CSM (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09–2.29, P = 0.016) were observed for SMIBC once it became muscle-invasive. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of 146 patients (73 for each group) were well matched, and SMIBC was confirmed to have an increased CSM risk (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09–3.06, P = 0.021) than PMIBC after muscle invasion.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that SMIBC, compared with PMIBC, had worse survival outcomes once it became muscle-invasive and suggested that specific attention should be paid to non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a high progression risk.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
167P - Genetic testing for prostate cancer: The Indian scenario
Presenter: Ganesh Bakshi
Session: Poster viewing 03
168P - Transcriptional profiling of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and distinct features are associated with clinical outcome
Presenter: BYULA JEE
Session: Poster viewing 03
169P - Urine tumor DNA fragmentation profiles provided a novel biomarker for early detection of prostate cancer
Presenter: Nianzeng Xing
Session: Poster viewing 03
170P - Safety, efficacy and pharmacoeconomic implications of low dose abiraterone in prostate cancer
Presenter: Suryakanta Acharya
Session: Poster viewing 03
171P - Clinical significance of prostate volume and testosterone reduction on lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy
Presenter: Jin Cho
Session: Poster viewing 03
172P - Impact on management of non-metastatic prostate cancer biochemical recurrence with use of 68Ga PET-PSMA PET/CT scans in single-institution experience
Presenter: Pimchanok Tuitemwong
Session: Poster viewing 03
173P - Clinical outcomes in stratification subgroups in the ARASENS study in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)
Presenter: Francis Parnis
Session: Poster viewing 03
175TiP - A prospective phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of olaparib plus abiraterone and prednisone combination therapy in mHSPC patients with HRR gene mutation
Presenter: Junlong Zhuang
Session: Poster viewing 03
186P - Degradation of BRCA2 expression by hyperthermia sensitizes HRD-negative (BRCA2 wild-type) ovarian cancer cells to niraparib
Presenter: Junyang Li
Session: Poster viewing 03