Abstract 146P
Background
Studies have classified muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) into primary (initially muscle-invasive, PMIBC) and secondary subtypes (initially non-muscle-invasive but progressed, SMIBC), in which controversial survival outcomes were demonstrated. However, a relevant Chinese cohort is yet to be reported.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with PMIBC or SMIBC at West China Hospital from January 2009 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. The Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher tests were employed to compare the baseline clinicopathological characteristics. Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox competing proportional risk model were used to compare the PMIBC and SMIBC survival outcomes. Then, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to reduce the bias caused by confounders and subgroup analysis was used to confirm the outcomes.
Results
A total of 405 MIBC patients were enrolled, including 286 PMIBC and 119 SMIBC patients, with a mean age of 64.66 years and 67.29 years and a mean follow-up of 27.54 months and 53.3 months, respectively. The SMIBC group had a higher proportion of older patients (17.65% vs. 9.09%), chronic disease (32.77% vs. 22.38%), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (19.33% vs. 8.04%). Before matching, SMIBC had a lower risk of overall mortality (OM) (hazard ratios [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–0.85, P = 0.005) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.94, P = 0.022) after the initial diagnosis. However, higher risks of OM (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02–2.10, P = 0.038) and CSM (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09–2.29, P = 0.016) were observed for SMIBC once it became muscle-invasive. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of 146 patients (73 for each group) were well matched, and SMIBC was confirmed to have an increased CSM risk (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09–3.06, P = 0.021) than PMIBC after muscle invasion.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that SMIBC, compared with PMIBC, had worse survival outcomes once it became muscle-invasive and suggested that specific attention should be paid to non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a high progression risk.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
140P - Lenvatinib + everolimus in mRCC that has progressed on immunotherapy: A real-world single center experience
Presenter: CHINNU JOMI
Session: Poster viewing 03
141P - Real-world study of cabozantinib treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in Taiwan
Presenter: Yu-Chieh Tsai
Session: Poster viewing 03
143P - Clinical outcomes of systemic therapy for hemodialysis patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Iwasa
Session: Poster viewing 03
144P - Association between immune-related adverse events and survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab
Presenter: Takanori Hayase
Session: Poster viewing 03
145P - Treatment outcomes and FGFR alterations in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer in Taiwan
Presenter: Jian-Ri Li
Session: Poster viewing 03
147P - Activity of single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in 1st-line (1L) “platinum-ineligible” patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) in real-life clinical practice
Presenter: Javier Molina Cerrillo
Session: Poster viewing 03
149P - A need for clear definitions and improved management for BCG-unresponsive tumors in Asia-Pacific
Presenter: Lui Shiong Lee
Session: Poster viewing 03
Resources:
Abstract
150P - Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Asia-Pacific
Presenter: Ravindran Kanesvaran
Session: Poster viewing 03
Resources:
Abstract
Slides