Abstract 120P
Background
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between DNA damage response (DDR)-related protein expression and clinical outcomes of patients with in gastric cancer stage IV and recurrent advanced gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy treated palliative 1st line chemotherapy.
Methods
A total of 611 gastric cancer patients had undergone D2 radical gastrectomy at the Chung-Ang University Hospital, between January 2005 and December 2017. In this study, 72 patients after gastrectomy treated palliative chemotherapy were enrolled. We performed the immunohistochemical assessment of MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1), MutS Homolog 2 (MSH2), at-rich interaction domain 1 (ARID1A), poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP-1), breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1), and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to evaluate for independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
Among the 72 patients studied, on immunohistochemical staining, deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) was observed in 19.4% (n = 14). The most common DDR gene whose expression was suppressed was PARP-1 (n = 41, 56.9%), followed by ATM (n = 26, 36.1%), ARID1A (n = 10, 13.9%), MLH1 (n = 12, 16.7%), BRCA1 (n = 11, 15.3%), and MSH2 (n = 3, 4.2%). HER2 (n = 6, 8.3%) and PD-L1 (n = 3, 4.2%) were expressed in 72 patients. The dMMR group exhibited a significantly longer median OS than the MMR-proficient (pMMR) group (19.9 months vs. 11.0 months; HR 0.472, 95% CI = 0.260-1.008, P = 0.032). The dMMR group exhibited a significantly longer median PFS than the pMMR group (7.0 months vs. 5.1 months; HR= 0.498, 95% CI = 0.267-0.928, P = 0.028).
Conclusions
The dMMR group in gastric cancers stage IV and recurrent gastric cancer after gastrectomy have better survivals than the pMMR group. Although dMMR is a predictive factor of immunotherapy in advanced gastric cancer, further studies are needed to determine whether it can be a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients treated with palliative cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
79P - Outcomes by baseline liver function in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab in the phase III HIMALAYA study
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster viewing 02
82P - A randomized controlled, open-label, adaptive phase III clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of EndoTAG-1 plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with measurable locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after FOLFIRINOX
Presenter: Muh-Hwan Su
Session: Poster viewing 02
83P - Impact of viral aetiology in the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster viewing 02
84P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large real life worldwide population
Presenter: Margherita Rimini
Session: Poster viewing 02
86P - Outcomes by primary tumour location in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in the phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster viewing 02
87P - Socio-demographic disparities in esophageal cancer: A SEER analysis
Presenter: Beas Siromoni
Session: Poster viewing 02