Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster viewing 02

120P - Clinical implication of DNA damage response gene in advanced gastric cancer stage IV and recurrent gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy treated palliative chemotherapy

Date

03 Dec 2022

Session

Poster viewing 02

Topics

Pathology/Molecular Biology

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

In Gyu Hwang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_9): S1454-S1484. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1123

Authors

I.G. Hwang1, S.E. Park2, J.E. Kim3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Hemato-oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, 06973 - Seoul/KR
  • 2 Division Of Hemato-oncology Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, 06973 - Seoul/KR
  • 3 Department Of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, 06973 - Seoul/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 120P

Background

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between DNA damage response (DDR)-related protein expression and clinical outcomes of patients with in gastric cancer stage IV and recurrent advanced gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy treated palliative 1st line chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 611 gastric cancer patients had undergone D2 radical gastrectomy at the Chung-Ang University Hospital, between January 2005 and December 2017. In this study, 72 patients after gastrectomy treated palliative chemotherapy were enrolled. We performed the immunohistochemical assessment of MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1), MutS Homolog 2 (MSH2), at-rich interaction domain 1 (ARID1A), poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP-1), breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1), and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to evaluate for independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Among the 72 patients studied, on immunohistochemical staining, deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) was observed in 19.4% (n = 14). The most common DDR gene whose expression was suppressed was PARP-1 (n = 41, 56.9%), followed by ATM (n = 26, 36.1%), ARID1A (n = 10, 13.9%), MLH1 (n = 12, 16.7%), BRCA1 (n = 11, 15.3%), and MSH2 (n = 3, 4.2%). HER2 (n = 6, 8.3%) and PD-L1 (n = 3, 4.2%) were expressed in 72 patients. The dMMR group exhibited a significantly longer median OS than the MMR-proficient (pMMR) group (19.9 months vs. 11.0 months; HR 0.472, 95% CI = 0.260-1.008, P = 0.032). The dMMR group exhibited a significantly longer median PFS than the pMMR group (7.0 months vs. 5.1 months; HR= 0.498, 95% CI = 0.267-0.928, P = 0.028).

Conclusions

The dMMR group in gastric cancers stage IV and recurrent gastric cancer after gastrectomy have better survivals than the pMMR group. Although dMMR is a predictive factor of immunotherapy in advanced gastric cancer, further studies are needed to determine whether it can be a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients treated with palliative cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.