Abstract 82P
Background
FOLFIRINOX is a global standard first-line (1L) treatment for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (APDAC), but the second-line option after its failure remains yet defined. Current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of EndoTAG-1 (paclitaxel in cationic liposomes) plus gemcitabine as a second-line treatment in APDAC after FOLFIRINOX.
Methods
Patients with histologically confirmed APDAC and failed to 1L FOLFIRINOX were eligible. Participants were stratified by disease stage (metastatic vs. locally advanced) and ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1) and then randomized 1:1 to receive either EndoTAG-1 22 mg/m2 twice weekly plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks (ET+Gem arm) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 alone (Gem arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of the intent-to-treat population.
Results
A total of 218 patients were enrolled: median age 62.0, 59.6% male, 52.8%/30.3% White/Asian, 86.7% metastatic diseases at enrollment, 44.5%/55.5% ECOG PS 0/1. Of the 108 subjects in the ET+Gem group and 110 subjects in the Gem group, six (5.6%) and eight (7.3%) did not receive assigned treatment, respectively. On intent-to-treat analysis, the median OS for patients in ET+Gem arm was 226 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 183-278) vs. 209 days (158-248) for Gem arm (p=0.665). The median PFS was 113 days (79-168) for the ET+Gem arm vs. 110 days (60-115) for the Gem armp (=0.435), whiles the objective response rate (ORR) in corresponding arm was 11.5% and 6.8%, respectively (p=0.263). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) grade 3 and above occurred in 82 patients (82/102, 80.4%) of the ET+Gem arm and 72 patients (72/102, 70.6%) in the Gem arm. Grade 5 / death related to TEAEs occurred for six patients (5.9%) in the ET+Gem arm and 11 patients (10.8%) in the Gem arm.
Conclusions
Add-on EndoTAG-1 did not significantly improve survival over gemcitabine alone in patients with FOLFIRINOX-refractory APDAC. No new safety issues were noted and the safety profile is manageable.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
SynCore Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Funding
SynCore Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
89P - Radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab for unresectable biliary tract cancer: A phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Zhenwei Peng
Session: Poster viewing 02
90P - Feasibility of using tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based testing for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Georges Azzi
Session: Poster viewing 02
92P - Safety of liver resection following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with macrovascular invasion: A pre-specified analysis of the TALENTop study
Presenter: Huichuan Sun
Session: Poster viewing 02
93P - Outcomes by disease status in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in the phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Takuji Okusaka
Session: Poster viewing 02
94P - The treatment burden of neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer
Presenter: Chun-Ling Chi
Session: Poster viewing 02
95P - Additional survival follow-up of TACTICS-L: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy (TACE) in combination strategy with lenvatinib in (LEN) patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan
Presenter: Yoshitaka Inaba
Session: Poster viewing 02
96P - Preoperative chemotherapy flot vs dox in patients of locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: POORNIMA DEVI UTHAYAKUMAR
Session: Poster viewing 02
97P - BEAR study: A single-arm, phase II trial of BI-754091 and afatinib for refractory esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Nai-Jung Chiang
Session: Poster viewing 02