Abstract 487P
Background
Afatinib is an irreversible second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) while gefitinib or erlotinib are reversible first-generation EGFR-TKIs.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients with EGFR mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving first-line afatinib versus gefitinib or erlotinib at University Malaya Medical Centre from 1st January 2015 to 31th December 2018.
Results
Of 113 patients, 24 (21.2%) received afatinib, 63 (55.8%) received gefitinib and 26 (23.0%) received erlotinib in first-line setting. Their demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in the table. Afatinib was used significantly more frequently in patients with rare or complex EGFR mutations (p = 0.005), and more often in patients with symptomatic brain metastases. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of patients treated with afatinib (13.1 months) was longer than that of patients treated with gefitinib (10.9 months) or erlotinib (7.8 months) (p = 0.479). Patients receiving afatinib had consistently longer PFS than patients receiving gefitinib for the first 17 months and erlotinib for the first 20 months. The overall response rate was higher in patients on afatinib (75.0%) than those on gefitinib (63.5%) or erlotinib (53.8%). There was no difference in the disease control rate. Three patients (2.7%) had severe side-effects while on EGFR-TKI. Of two patients on afatinib, one had grade-3 diarrhea while another had grade 3 stomatitis, rash and paronychia. One patient had grade 3 rash on gefitinib.Table:
487P Clinical characteristic of 113 patients on first-line EGFR-TKI
Characteristics, No (%) | Afatinib (24) | Gefitinib (63) | Erlotinib (26) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symp brain mets | No Yes | 17 (70.8) 7 (29.2) | 53 (84.1) 10 (15.9) | 22 (84.6) 4 (15.4) | 0.181 |
EGFR subtype | 19 del 21 L858R Rare/complex | 16 (66.7) 2 (8.3) 6 (25.0) | 39 (61.9) 20 (31.7) 4 (6.3) | 22 (84.6) 3 (11.5) 1 (3.8) | 0.005 |
Side-effect | grade 1-2 grade 3 | 22 (91.7) 2 (8.3) | 62 (98.4) 1 (1.6) | 26 (100) 0 | 0.007 |
Objective response | Yes No | 18 (75.0) 6 (25.0) | 40 (63.5) 23 (36.5) | 14 (53.8) 12 (46.2) | 0.298 |
Disease control | Yes No | 23 (95.8) 1 (4.2) | 59 (93.7) 4 (6.3) | 24 (92.3) 2 (7.7) | 0.872 |
Median PFS | Months Event, No. (%) | 13.1 19 (79.2) | 10.9 49 (77.8) | 7.8 19 (73.1) | 0.479 |
Conclusions
Patients receiving first-line afatinib demonstrated longer mPFS than those on first-line gefitinib or erlotinib. The lack of statistical significance in this study is because of the small number of patients treated with afatinib, more frequent rare or complex EGFR mutations and more symptomatic brain metastases among afatinib treated patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
143P - NOTCH3 expression predicts poor survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell cancers
Presenter: Raja Pramanik
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
144P - Severe hypovitaminosis D in metastatic gastric cancer patients from the Northern and Southern hemispheres: Data from the EXPAND phase III trial
Presenter: Radka Obermannova
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
145P - Role of Glasgow prognostic score in chemo-naïve patients with advanced biliary tract cancer and good performance status
Presenter: Toshikazu Moriwaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
146P - Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of high-quality studies
Presenter: Bin Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
147P - Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
Presenter: Yingtai Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
148P - Efficacy of capecitabine and oxaliplatin versus S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer after D2 lymph node dissection according to lymph node ratio and N stage
Presenter: Seunghwan Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
150P - A Phase Ib Study of IMU-131 HER2/neu peptide vaccine plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2/neu overexpressing metastatic or advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction
Presenter: Yee Chao
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
151P - Gene expression profiling for a better understanding of gastric cancer: From the perspective of metabolic rearrangement
Presenter: Midie Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
152P - Long-term outcomes of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy-based and intensity-modulated radiotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Chia-Lun Chang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
153P - Exosomal LINC00174 facilitates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in residual hepatocellular carcinoma after insufficient radiofrequency ablation by regulating c-JUN/MYCBP/c-Myc axis
Presenter: Dening Ma
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract