Abstract 168P
Background
It is important to predict prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy. Several studies have reported that Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), which was based on serum albumin (Alb) and C-reactive protein (CRP), was associated with poor prognosis in many cancers. However, it is unclear whether GPS has prognostic value when patients receive Irinotecan, which is a key drug of advanced gastric cancer.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective multicenter study and investigated association between efficacy and GPS in patients who received irinotecan monotherapy between January 2010 and December 2017. All patients had to receive fluoropyrimidine and platinum as prior therapy. GPS was identified that GPS 0 was CRP ≤1.0 mg/dL and Alb ≥3.5 g/dL, GPS 1 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL or Alb <3.5 g/dL, and GPS 2 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL and Alb <3.5 g/dL.
Results
There were 174 patients at 8 centers included in this study. The number of patients with GPS 0/1/2 was 76/56/42, respectively. In GPS 0/1/2 patients, performance status (0-1/2≤), treatment line 2nd/3rd or later, and HER2 status were significantly different among them(p < 0.01). As for safety, there was no significant difference among GPS 0/1/2 patients. In GPS 0/1/2 patients, median PFS were 3.7/2.8/2.0 months (p < 0.01), median OS were 11.9/7.2/6.7 months (p < 0.01), respectively. In multivariate analysis, GPS was associated with shorter PFS (GPS 0 vs 1/0vs 2 : HR 1.180/2.378, 95%C.I. 0.793-1.758/1.405-4.024, p = 0.414/0.001), and shorter OS (GPS 0 vs 1/0vs 2 : HR 1.520/2.529, 95%C.I. 1.002-2.305/1.518-4.213, p = 0.049/<0.001).
Conclusions
In this analysis, GPS might be a predictive and prognostic factor in treatment with irinotecan monotherapy for patients with AGC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Yoshito Komatsu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
97P - The role of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the status of surgical margin in rectal cancer
Presenter: Jong Hoon Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
98P - Influence of DPYD*9, DPYD*6 and GSTP1 ile105val genetic polymorphisms on capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) associated toxicities in colorectal cancer patients
Presenter: Ashok Varma
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
99P - Patient-derived tumour model by new culture method leading to the precision medicine
Presenter: Norikatsu Miyoshi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
100P - Clinical impact and carcinogenic mechanism of NCAPG overexpression in colon cancer
Presenter: Kai-Yuan Lin
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
101P - Combined cellular immunotherapy and chemotherapy improves clinical outcome and displays safety in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Chang Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
102P - Clinical features of anorectal cancer in patients with Crohn’s disease: Japanese single center study
Presenter: Kazuhiro Watanabe
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
103P - Contrast-enhanced CT-based textural parameters as potential prognostic factors of survival for colorectal cancer patients receiving targeted therapy
Presenter: Yanfei Yang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
104P - Prognostic significance of tumour location to the oncologic outcome of colon cancer
Presenter: Sare Hosseini
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
105P - Detection and clinical significance of circulating tumour cells in patients with rectal cancer
Presenter: Shuohui Dong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
106P - The risk of malignization incidence in patients with polyps and polyposis of the colon and rectum
Presenter: Yakov Ten
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract