Abstract 168P
Background
It is important to predict prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy. Several studies have reported that Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), which was based on serum albumin (Alb) and C-reactive protein (CRP), was associated with poor prognosis in many cancers. However, it is unclear whether GPS has prognostic value when patients receive Irinotecan, which is a key drug of advanced gastric cancer.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective multicenter study and investigated association between efficacy and GPS in patients who received irinotecan monotherapy between January 2010 and December 2017. All patients had to receive fluoropyrimidine and platinum as prior therapy. GPS was identified that GPS 0 was CRP ≤1.0 mg/dL and Alb ≥3.5 g/dL, GPS 1 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL or Alb <3.5 g/dL, and GPS 2 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL and Alb <3.5 g/dL.
Results
There were 174 patients at 8 centers included in this study. The number of patients with GPS 0/1/2 was 76/56/42, respectively. In GPS 0/1/2 patients, performance status (0-1/2≤), treatment line 2nd/3rd or later, and HER2 status were significantly different among them(p < 0.01). As for safety, there was no significant difference among GPS 0/1/2 patients. In GPS 0/1/2 patients, median PFS were 3.7/2.8/2.0 months (p < 0.01), median OS were 11.9/7.2/6.7 months (p < 0.01), respectively. In multivariate analysis, GPS was associated with shorter PFS (GPS 0 vs 1/0vs 2 : HR 1.180/2.378, 95%C.I. 0.793-1.758/1.405-4.024, p = 0.414/0.001), and shorter OS (GPS 0 vs 1/0vs 2 : HR 1.520/2.529, 95%C.I. 1.002-2.305/1.518-4.213, p = 0.049/<0.001).
Conclusions
In this analysis, GPS might be a predictive and prognostic factor in treatment with irinotecan monotherapy for patients with AGC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Yoshito Komatsu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
74TiP - Phase I study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, as monotherapy and in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Kentaro Yamazaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
75P - A parallel deep learning network framework for whole-body bone scan image analysis
Presenter: Xiaorong Pu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
76P - Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials
Presenter: Jukyung Jeon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A prognostic nomogram for the prediction of neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - The clinical usefulness of a new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes from surgically resected specimen in colorectal cancer: Prospective randomized study
Presenter: Shiki Fujino
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Concurrent or consolidation chemotherapy during radiation as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis from two prospective study
Presenter: JianWei Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Body mass index, tumour location, and colorectal cancer survival
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Helicobacter bilis may play a role in the carcinogenesis of colitis associated colon cancer correlating to increased number of CD4+CD45RB+ T cells
Presenter: Xiangsheng Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Comprehensive evaluation of relapse risk (CERR) score for colorectal liver metastases development and validation
Presenter: Jianmin Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
85P - Which is the best partner for capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract