Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Previous Page Next Page

Currently-approved PARP inhibitors carry a similar overall safety profile, with a class effect noted for all grade nausea/vomiting, grade ≥3 anaemia, and grade ≥3 fatigue [1, 2]. Among the most common adverse events associated with PARP inhibitor treatment in clinical trials were fatigue, anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, and decreased appetite [3-9]. Some of these toxicities had a high incidence in the placebo arms of the randomized trials as well.

Many of the grade ≥3 events initially reported with PARP inhibition resolved after the first months of treatment, although the incidence of grade 3 fatigue/asthenia was found sometimes found to increase through treatment [2, 10].

Although discontinuation from PARP inhibitors is uncommon, many patients do require dose reductions; however, the impact of dose reductions on efficacy is not clear as there has been conflicting data to date [2].

There are also some drug-specific differences between PARP inhibitors to be aware of. Rucaparib is associated with increased incidence of laboratory abnormalities (elevated ALT, AST, and creatinine) [1, 5], and relatively high incidences of thrombocytopenia and hypertension have been observed with niraparib [1, 7].

Table 3:  Summary of class effects associated with PARP inhibitor treatment and their management* [1, 2]

Fatigue

Severity
grade

Management

Proactive
Strategies

1 to ≥3

• Exclude anaemia
• Non-pharmacologic: massage/mind-body approaches
• Exercise
• Manage pain, depression, sleep disturbances
• Dose adjustment
• Treatment pause

Conserving energy
Assess for underlying causes

Other
notes

Similar levels to that observed for chemotherapy
Fatigue could be disease-related rather than treatment-related

Haematological toxicity

Severity
grade

Management

Proactive
Strategies

1 or 2 common; 3 uncommon

• Mild-moderate anaemia – transfusions or other standards of care
• Severe toxicity or transfusion dependence: interrupt treatment
• If parameters abnormal after 4 weeks of interruption, conduct bone marrow and/or blood cytogenetic analysis

Ensure baseline values are in normal range or grade 1:
Haemoglobin ≥ 100g/L
Platelets ≥ 75 x 109/L
Neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 109/L

Drug
differences

Olaparib/rucaparib/ talazoparib: anaemia> thrombocytopenia & neutropenia
Niraparib: thrombocytopenia> anaemia>neutropenia

Other
notes

Grade ≥3 haematological toxicities are the most common AE leading to dose modification

Nausea and vomiting

Severity
grade

Management

Proactive
Strategies

Mild to moderate

• Prescribe antiemetic regimen as needed
• Dose interruption, 1-2 days
• Reduce dose if dose interruption not successful

Counsel about risk
Provide prophylactic antiemetics

Other
notes

Most common during first month
Improves with time
May be related to acid reflux (manage reflux as well)
Administer with food

*AE management will depend on the grade. This table provides practical suggestions for AE management, but in the clinic the approach should be tailored to the patient and the severity of the AE.

You can find out more about specific aspects of PARP inhibitor safety by clicking on the links below the reference list.

References

  1. LaFargue CJ, Dal Molin GZ, Sood AK, Coleman RL. Exploring and comparing adverse events between PARP inhibitors. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: e15-e28.
  2. Paluch-Shimon S. Managing side effects of PARP inhibitors. In ESMO 2018 Congress. Munich, Germany 2018.
  3. Litton JK, Rugo HS, Ettl J et al. Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and a Germline BRCA Mutation. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 753-763.
  4. Robson M, Im SA, Senkus E et al. Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 523-533.
  5. Coleman RL, Oza AM, Lorusso D et al. Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017; 390: 1949-1961.
  6. Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 852-861.
  7. Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J et al. Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 2154-2164.
  8. Pujade-Lauraine E, Ledermann JA, Selle F et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 1274-1284.
  9. Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G et al. Maintenance Olaparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379.
  10. Friedlander M, Matulonis U, Gourley C et al. Long-term efficacy, tolerability and overall survival in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer treated with maintenance olaparib capsules following response to chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2018; 119: 1075-1085.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings