Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Cocktail & Poster Display session

103P - MSI detection by NGS using tumor samples and liquid biopsy for patients with solid tumors: A single institution experience

Date

04 Oct 2023

Session

Cocktail & Poster Display session

Presenters

Alexandra Lebedeva

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (suppl_1_S5): 1-55. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101646

Authors

A. Lebedeva1, E. Belova2, T. Grigoreva3, O.A. Kuznetsova4, A. Kavun3, S. Aliyarova3, E. Veselovsky3, V. Iudina5, V. Nikulin3, D.A. Kravchuk6, M. Fedyanin7, V. Mileyko3, M.V. Ivanov8

Author affiliations

  • 1 Biology Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 - Moscow/RU
  • 2 Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 - Moscow/RU
  • 3 OncoAtlas LLC, 119049 - Moscow/RU
  • 4 N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, 115478 - Moscow/RU
  • 5 Chemotherapy Department #2, National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Blokhin, 115478 - Moscow/RU
  • 6 State Budgetary Institution of Health of the City of Moscow "Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka" of the Department of Health of the City of Moscow, 142770 - Moscow/RU
  • 7 State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of the City of Moscow "Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka" of the Department of Health of the City of Moscow, 142770 - Moscow/RU
  • 8 R&d, OncoAtlas LLC, 119049 - Moscow/RU

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 103P

Background

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a powerful predictor for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy across tumor types. Although conventional MSI testing strategies are widely used, NGS represents a promising tool for MSI detection. We have developed and validated the NGS test system for MSI detection in solid tumors.

Methods

The following sample types were selected for validation of our test system: G1 - archive FFPE tumor samples collected from patients with known MSI status; G2 - archive paired (FFPE/ctDNA) samples collected from patients with tumors where MSI is uncommon (<1%); G3 - paired (FFPE/ctDNA) MSI+ samples. All FFPE samples were tested using the gold standard (5-loci PCR, 4-antibody IHC). Samples were considered MSI+ if PCR or IHC were positive; MSI- when both were negative. Detection of MSI was performed using k-mer distributions of 28 loci.

Results

A total of 123 samples for 109 patients were analyzed - 77 (62.6%) FFPE, 46 (37.4%) ctDNA; 6 patients had paired samples. A total of 30 (FFPE, 83% CRC), 72 (41 FFPE, 31 ctDNA; 62.3% NSCLC) and 21 (6 patients; 6 FFPE, 15 ctDNA; 66.7% CRC) were selected for G1, G2 and G3, respectively. Rate of agreement (κ) between NGS and gold standard in G1 was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.58-1) [κ for NGS/PCR 0.93 (95% CI, 0.8-1)], and 1 in G3. In G2, 100% of samples were MSS following NGS. In G3, for all 6 samples there were no disagreements between NGS and gold standard. Across all analyzed FFPE samples, κ between NGS and gold standard was 0.9 (95% CI 0.88-0.92). When comparing results of PCR and IHC (FFPE samples), low concordance was noted (κ=0.5, 95% CI, 0.22-0.78). High concordance was observed between PCR and NGS (κ=0.94, 95% CI, 0.83-1). Concordance of IHC and NGS was low (κ=0.55, 95% CI, 0.28-0.83). Sensitivity / specificity of NGS vs IHC in detecting MSI were 76.2% / 80%. Sensitivity / specificity of NGS vs PCR were 95.5% / 100%. Sensitivity / specificity of NGS in detecting MSI using ctDNA vs FFPE were 100% / 100%.

Conclusions

Low concordance was observed between IHC and PCR for MSI detection (κ=0.5, 95% CI, 0.22-0.78). Concordance of PCR and NGS was high (κ=0.94, 95% CI, 0.83-1); concordance between IHC and NGS was lower (κ=0.55, 95% CI, 0.28-0.83). Sensitivity of MSI detection using ctDNA was 100%.

Editorial acknowledgement

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

This study was supported by Russian Science Foundation (grant № 22-75-10154).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.