Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Cocktail & Poster Display session

46P - Promising epi(genetic) biomarkers for ovarian tumor prognosis

Date

16 Oct 2024

Session

Cocktail & Poster Display session

Presenters

Ieva Vaicekauskaitė

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_6): 1-20. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103740

Authors

I. Vaicekauskaitė1, P. Kazlauskaite1, R. Gineikaite2, R. Ciurliene3, J.R. Lazutka2, R. Sabaliauskaite1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Genetic Diagnostic Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, 08660 - Vilnius/LT
  • 2 Life Sciences Centre - Vilnius University, LT-10257 - Vilnius/LT
  • 3 National Cancer Institute, 08660 - Vilnius/LT

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 46P

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the second most lethal gynecologic malignancy in the world. Most deaths are attributed to high-grade serous type OC (HGSOC) which typically presents at a late stage (FIGO III-IV). Currently, there are no reliable (epi)genetic biomarkers for OC.

Methods

Tumor tissue samples from 56 patients with gynecologic tumors (32 HGSOC, 15 other malignant gynecologic tumors, and 9 benign gynecologic tumors) were used for both DNA and RNA extraction. In all, a panel of 10 genes, including Notch pathway (NOTCH1-4, HES1, DLL1, and JAG2), Wnt pathway (CTNNB1, FBXW7) and chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF member ARID1A gene expression, was analyzed via RT-qPCR, as well as promoter methylation of ARID1A and homeobox (HOX) related genes (HOPX, ALX4, CDX2) analysis conducted using methylation specific PCR. ROC analysis was used to analyze biomarker prediction of HGSOC tumors, and LASSO algorithm used to select the best model for tumors prognosis.

Results

A significant reduction in CTNNB1, FBXW7, ARID1A, NOTCH1-4, DLL1, and HES1 gene expression was observed in OC patients when compared to benign cases (p < 0.03). Wnt gene, and Notch gene DLL1 and HES1 expression was also significantly decreased in HGSOC samples in comparison with other gynecologic tumors and Wnt genes also significantly decreased in HGSOC patients with FIGO stage IV tumors (CTNNB1 p = 0.02, FBXW7 p = 0.01). CDX2 and HOPX related gene promoter methylation was significantly higher in OC patients compared to benign cases (p = 0.02). ROC analysis of OC samples revealed HES1 as the best predictor of HGSOC vs other gynecologic malignancies (AUC = 0.84, sensitivity = 73%, specificity = 91%) while CDX2 was the best promotor methylation biomarker (AUC = 0.57, sensitivity = 67%, specificity = 47%). A combination of 7 biomarkers (NOTCH4, CTNNB1, JAG2, HES1 expression and HOPX, CDX2 and ARID1A promoter methylation status) showed perfect separation of HGSOC from other gynecologic cancers (AUC = 1).

Conclusions

Gene expression and promoter methylation status could be useful for ovarian tumor prognosis, however, a more extensive analysis of these biomarkers in a larger cohort and non-invasive samples is needed for further validation.

Editorial acknowledgement

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

National Cancer Institute, Lithuania.

Funding

National Cancer Institute, Lithuania.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.