Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Proffered Paper session 2

9O - Pancreatic cancer risk in individuals with newly diagnosed diabetes: Insights from the AMORIS cohort in Sweden

Date

05 Oct 2023

Session

Proffered Paper session 2

Presenters

ziying Zhang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (suppl_1_S5): 1-55. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101646

Authors

Z. Zhang1, S. Carlsson2, N. Hammar2, M.D.P. Acedo Nunez3, P. Brennan4, L. Oldfield5, M. Golbabaee6, D. Sarker7, S. Kordasti8, A. Kunzmann9, M. van Hemelrijck10, A. Santaolalla11

Author affiliations

  • 1 KCL - 1. Systems Cancer Immunology Group, Comprehensive Cancer Centre,, WC2R 2LS - London/GB
  • 2 3. institute Of Environmental Medicine, Sodersjukhuset - Karolinska Institutet (KI SOS), 118 83 - Stockholm/SE
  • 3 4. institute For Liver And Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, UCL - University College London, WC1E 6BT - London/GB
  • 4 5. centre For Clinical Brain Sciences, University Of Edinburgh,, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, EH4 2XR - Edinburgh/GB
  • 5 University of Liverpool, L69 3GF - Liverpool/GB
  • 6 University of Bristol - Bristol Medical School, BS8 1UD - Bristol/GB
  • 7 Guy's Hospital, SE1 9RT - London/GB
  • 8 Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College, London/GB
  • 9 Queen's University Belfast, BT7 1NN - Belfast/GB
  • 10 Translational Oncology And Urology Research (tour), King's College London - KCL, WC2R 2LS - London/GB
  • 11 Cancer Epidemiology, KCL - King's College London, WC2R 2LS - London/GB

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 9O

Background

Delayed diagnosis contributes to poor survival in pancreatic cancer (PC). Early detection may improve outcomes, but symptom-based diagnostic approaches are challenging, because most symptoms are non-specific and more likely to be associated with a non-cancer cause. Approximately forty percent of people diagnosed with PC have diabetes at the time of PC diagnosis. Few PC prediction models exist for this population, with limited performance and high risk of bias. We aim to refine performance in predicting PC in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes by identifying and weighting commonly used routine blood markers, which could potentially enhance identification of individuals at high risk of PC in primary care with a simple blood test.

Methods

We identified individuals from the AMORIS cohort study with newly diagnosed diabetes based on the Swedish National Diabetes Registry and patient registry. Individuals aged 50 or older with type 2 diabetes were included. All participants presented a routine biomarker panel measured after diagnosis of diabetes, including liver enzymes, glucose and lipids profile, markers of inflammation and sugar metabolism. Possible confounding factors such as age, sex, and educational level were considered. Initial multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted.

Results

A total population of 101,051 individuals with newly diagnosed diabetes were identified. 1390 PC events occurred during the follow up time (meanyears=25.38). Preliminary results identified increased risk of PC with higher total cholesterol (mmol/L) (HR (95%CI): 1.11 (1.03-1.19)) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) (μkat/L) (HR (95%CI): 1.10 (1.05-1.16)) and lower albumin (g/L) (HR (95%CI): 0.95 (0.92-0.96)). Table: 9O

Multivariate biomarker panel continuous

Variable HR CI (95%) p-value
Albumin (g/L) 0.946 0.916 0.976 0.0006
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (μkat/L) 1.102 1.045 1.161 0.0003
fS-glucose (mmol/L) 1.048 0.995 1.104 0.0758
Cholesterol (mmol/L) 1.106 1.025 1.194 0.0098
.

Conclusions

Routine blood markers could be a non-invasive cost-effective avenue to identify diabetic patients at higher risk of PC and improve early detection. Work is ongoing to evaluate lag time, discrimination analysis and prediction scores.

Editorial acknowledgement

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Cancer Research UK and Pancreatic Cancer Research.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.